» Articles » PMID: 36217503

Concurrent Training and Interindividual Response in Women with a High Number of Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors

Abstract

The non-responders (NRs) after exercise training have been poorly studied in populations with morbid obesity. The purpose of this study was to determine the NR prevalence after 20 weeks of concurrent training of morbidly obese women with a high or low number of metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk factors. Twenty-eight women with morbid obesity participated in an exercise training intervention and were allocated into two groups distributed based on a high (≥3, = 11) or low number (<3, = 17) of MetS risk factors. The main outcomes were waist circumference (WC), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), high-density lipids (HDL-c), triglycerides (Tg), and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and secondary outcomes were body composition, anthropometric and physical fitness, determined before and after 20 weeks of concurrent training. NRs were defined as previously used technical error cut-off points for the MetS outcomes. Significantly different (all < 0.05) prevalences of NRs between the H-MetS vs. L-MetS groups (respectively) in WC (NRs 18.2 % vs. 41.1 %, < 0.0001), SBP (NRs 72.7 % vs. 47.0 %, = 0.022), DBP (NRs 54.5 % vs. 76.4 %, < 0.0001), FPG (NRs 100% vs. 64.8 %, < 0.0001), and HDL-c (NRs 90.9 % vs. 64.7 %, = 0.012) were observed. In addition, the H-MetS group evidenced significant changes on ΔSBP (-10.2 ± 11.4 mmHg), ΔFPG (-5.8 ± 8.2 mg/dl), ΔHDL-c (+4.0 ± 5.9 mg/dl), and ΔTg (-8.8 ± 33.8 mg/dl), all < 0.05. The L-MetS group only showed significant changes in ΔWC (-3.8 ± 5.0 cm, = 0.009). Comparing H-MetS vs. L-MetS groups, significant differences were observed in ∆FPG (-5.8 ± 8.2 vs. +0.3 ± 3.2 mg/dl, = 0.027), but not in other MetS outcomes. In conclusion, 20 weeks of concurrent training promotes greater beneficial effects in morbidly obese patients with a high number of MetS risk factors. However, the NR prevalence for improving MetS outcomes was significantly superior in these more-diseased groups in SBP, FPG, and HDL-c, independent of their major training-induced effects.

Citing Articles

Interindividual Variability Response to Resistance and High-Intensity Interval Training on Blood Pressure Reduction in Hypertensive Older Adults.

Cano-Montoya J, Hurtado N, Nunez Vergara C, Baez Vargas S, Rojas-Vargas M, Martinez-Huenchullan S J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852308 PMC: 11765815. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010030.


Average and Interindividual Effects to a Comprehensive Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Program.

Tuesta M, Alvarez C, Pedemonte O, Araneda O, Manriquez-Villarroel P, Berthelon P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612584 PMC: 9819899. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010261.

References
1.
Davidsen P, Gallagher I, Hartman J, Tarnopolsky M, Dela F, Helge J . High responders to resistance exercise training demonstrate differential regulation of skeletal muscle microRNA expression. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010; 110(2):309-17. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00901.2010. View

2.
Dunstan D, Daly R, Owen N, Jolley D, de Courten M, Shaw J . High-intensity resistance training improves glycemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(10):1729-36. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1729. View

3.
Astorino T, Schubert M . Individual responses to completion of short-term and chronic interval training: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e97638. PMC: 4029621. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097638. View

4.
Delgado-Floody P, Alvarez C, Cadore E, Flores-Opazo M, Caamano-Navarrete F, Izquierdo M . Preventing metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity with resistance training: Reporting interindividual variability. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 29(12):1368-1381. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.07.002. View

5.
Gremeaux V, Drigny J, Nigam A, Juneau M, Guilbeault V, Latour E . Long-term lifestyle intervention with optimized high-intensity interval training improves body composition, cardiometabolic risk, and exercise parameters in patients with abdominal obesity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(11):941-50. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182643ce0. View