» Articles » PMID: 36217414

Examining Youth Participation in Ongoing Community and Citizen Science Programs in 3 Different Out-of-school Settings

Abstract

We investigated youth participation in three Community and Citizen Science (CCS) programs led by natural history museums in out-of-school settings. Using second generation Activity Theory, we looked at repeated participation over time, collecting and then qualitatively analyzing ethnographic fieldnote observations on focal youth participation and components of the activity systems. We found each program provided multiple and unique access points for youth to participate in environmental science. Further, when facilitators emphasized the scientific goals of the programs clearly and repeatedly, youth participation in the scientific processes of the CCS programs deepened. Access to scientific tools, facilitation in using them, and repeatedly applying them in authentic research, enabled youth to participate in different aspects of CCS, from exploring to submitting biological data. Repeated participation in CCS activities provided the opportunities for youth to try the same type of participation multiple times (intensification), as well as provided the opportunity for youth to try different types of participation (diversification). Our findings suggest that repeated participation in authentic scientific research in CCS contexts fosters youth development of new roles and possible development of environmental science identities.

Citing Articles

Young people in iNaturalist: a blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring.

Herodotou C, Ismail N, I Benavides Lahnstein A, Aristeidou M, Young A, Johnson R Int J Sci Educ B Commun Public Engagem. 2024; 14(2):129-156.

PMID: 38818044 PMC: 11138322. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2023.2217472.


Peer Learning Has Double Effects in Clinical Research Education: A Qualitative Study.

Nakao H, Nomura O, Nagata C, Ishiguro A Int J Pediatr. 2024; 2024:5513079.

PMID: 38314332 PMC: 10838209. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5513079.

References
1.
Bonney R, Shirk J, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Ballard H, Miller-Rushing A . Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science. 2014; 343(6178):1436-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554. View

2.
Jorgensen F, Jorgensen D . Citizen science for environmental citizenship. Conserv Biol. 2020; 35(4):1344-1347. PMC: 8359442. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13649. View

3.
Parrish J, Jones T, Burgess H, He Y, Fortson L, Cavalier D . Hoping for optimality or designing for inclusion: Persistence, learning, and the social network of citizen science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):1894-1901. PMC: 6369789. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807186115. View

4.
Haywood B, Parrish J, Dolliver J . Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conserv Biol. 2016; 30(3):476-86. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12702. View

5.
Wals A, Brody M, Dillon J, Stevenson R . Science education. Convergence between science and environmental education. Science. 2014; 344(6184):583-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1250515. View