» Articles » PMID: 36216940

Health Effects Associated with Consumption of Unprocessed Red Meat: a Burden of Proof Study

Abstract

Characterizing the potential health effects of exposure to risk factors such as red meat consumption is essential to inform health policy and practice. Previous meta-analyses evaluating the effects of red meat intake have generated mixed findings and do not formally assess evidence strength. Here, we conducted a systematic review and implemented a meta-regression-relaxing conventional log-linearity assumptions and incorporating between-study heterogeneity-to evaluate the relationships between unprocessed red meat consumption and six potential health outcomes. We found weak evidence of association between unprocessed red meat consumption and colorectal cancer, breast cancer, type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Moreover, we found no evidence of an association between unprocessed red meat and ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. We also found that while risk for the six outcomes in our analysis combined was minimized at 0 g unprocessed red meat intake per day, the 95% uncertainty interval that incorporated between-study heterogeneity was very wide: from 0-200 g d. While there is some evidence that eating unprocessed red meat is associated with increased risk of disease incidence and mortality, it is weak and insufficient to make stronger or more conclusive recommendations. More rigorous, well-powered research is needed to better understand and quantify the relationship between consumption of unprocessed red meat and chronic disease.

Citing Articles

Considering the nutritional benefits and health implications of red meat in the era of meatless initiatives.

Kavanaugh M, Rodgers D, Rodriguez N, Leroy F Front Nutr. 2025; 12:1525011.

PMID: 39935586 PMC: 11812593. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1525011.


The Fatty Acid Content, Health Lipid Indices, and Instrumental, Histological, and Sensory Quality of Hare Meat ( Pallas).

Frunza G, Ciobanu M, Murariu O, Radu-Rusu R, Boisteanu P Foods. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39856976 PMC: 11764587. DOI: 10.3390/foods14020310.


Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.

Mustapa M, Baba Y, Baishakhy S, Kallas Z Food Sci Nutr. 2025; 13(1):e4753.

PMID: 39803275 PMC: 11725167. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4753.


The Importance of Self-Identities and Habitual Behavior for Eating More Plant Foods.

Jezewska-Zychowicz M, Sajdakowska M, Gebski J, Kosicka-Gebska M, Gutkowska K Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683457 PMC: 11643576. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234063.


Smaller meat portions contribute the most to reducing meat consumption in the United Kingdom.

Vonderschmidt A, Jaacks L, Alexander P, Green R, Bellows A, Stewart C Nat Food. 2024; 5(12):982-987.

PMID: 39487348 PMC: 11655353. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01070-2.


References
1.
Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein A, Schulze M, Manson J, Willett W . Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94(4):1088-96. PMC: 3173026. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.018978. View

2.
Demeyer D, Mertens B, De Smet S, Ulens M . Mechanisms Linking Colorectal Cancer to the Consumption of (Processed) Red Meat: A Review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015; 56(16):2747-66. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2013.873886. View

3.
Bellavia A, Stilling F, Wolk A . High red meat intake and all-cause cardiovascular and cancer mortality: is the risk modified by fruit and vegetable intake?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016; 104(4):1137-1143. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.135335. View

4.
Larsson S, Orsini N . Red meat and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 179(3):282-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt261. View

5.
Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S . Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019; 393(10170):447-492. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. View