» Articles » PMID: 36212853

Simulated Seasonal Diets Alter Yak Rumen Microbiota Structure and Metabolic Function

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Oct 10
PMID 36212853
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Yak is the only ruminant on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau that grazes year-round. Although previous research has shown that yak rumen microbiota fluctuates in robust patterns with seasonal foraging, it remains unclear whether these dynamic shifts are driven by changes in environment or nutrient availability. The study examines the response of yak rumen microbiota (bacteria, fungi, and archaea) to simulated seasonal diets, excluding the contribution of environmental factors. A total of 18 adult male yaks were randomly divided into three groups, including a nutrition stress group (NSG, simulating winter pasture), a grazing simulation group (GSG, simulating warm season pasture), and a supplementation group (SG, simulating winter pasture supplemented with feed concentrates). Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) profiling showed that ruminal acetate, propionate and total VFA contents were significantly higher ( < 0.05) in GSG rumen. Metagenomic analysis showed that (53.9%) and (37.1%) were the dominant bacterial phyla in yak rumen across dietary treatments. In GSG samples, , , and were the most abundant, while was significantly more abundant in NSG samples ( < 0.05) than that in GSG. The known fiber-degrading fungus, was significantly more abundant in NSG and SG samples, while were more prevalent in NSG rumen than in the SG rumen. These findings imply that a diverse consortium of microbes may cooperate in response to fluctuating nutrient availability, with depletion of known rumen taxa under nutrient deficiency. Archaeal community composition showed less variation between treatments than bacterial and fungal communities. Additionally, was significantly positively correlated with acetate levels, both of which are prevalent in GSG compared with other groups. Correlation analysis between microbial taxa and VFA production or between specific rumen microbes further illustrated a collective response to nutrient availability by gut microbiota and rumen VFA metabolism. PICRUSt and FUNGuild functional prediction analysis indicated fluctuation response of the function of microbial communities among groups. These results provide a framework for understanding how microbiota participate in seasonal adaptations to forage availability in high-altitude ruminants, and form a basis for future development of probiotic supplements to enhance nutrient utilization in livestock.

Citing Articles

Effects of residual black fruit on growth performance, rumen fermentation parameters, microflora and economic benefits of fattening sheep.

Hou L, Duan P, Yang Y, Shah A, Li J, Xu C Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1528126.

PMID: 39867601 PMC: 11760609. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1528126.


Identification and Bioactivity Analysis of a Novel Species, sp. nov. Bos-x6-28, Isolated from Feces of the Yak ().

Ma Q, Xiang X, Ma Y, Li G, Liu X, Jia B Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39766628 PMC: 11672612. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13121238.


Environmental Driving of Adaptation Mechanism on Rumen Microorganisms of Sheep Based on Metagenomics and Metabolomics Data Analysis.

He H, Fang C, Liu L, Li M, Liu W Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456741 PMC: 11508146. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252010957.


Multi-omics insights into the energy compensation of rumen microbiota of grazing yaks in cold season.

Bai J, Tang L, Bi Y, Li M Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1467841.

PMID: 39444681 PMC: 11496799. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1467841.


Seasonal stability of the rumen microbiome contributes to the adaptation patterns to extreme environmental conditions in grazing yak and cattle.

Guo W, Zhou M, Li F, Neves A, Ma T, Bi S BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):240.

PMID: 39443951 PMC: 11515522. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-02035-4.


References
1.
Wu D, Vinitchaikul P, Deng M, Zhang G, Sun L, Gou X . Host and altitude factors affect rumen bacteria in cattle. Braz J Microbiol. 2020; 51(4):1573-1583. PMC: 7688796. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-020-00380-4. View

2.
Sirohi S, Chaudhary P, Singh N, Singh D, Puniya A . The 16S rRNA and mcrA gene based comparative diversity of methanogens in cattle fed on high fibre based diet. Gene. 2013; 523(2):161-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.002. View

3.
Ishaq S, Wright A . Insight into the bacterial gut microbiome of the North American moose (Alces alces). BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12:212. PMC: 3585231. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-212. View

4.
Douglas G, Maffei V, Zaneveld J, Yurgel S, Brown J, Taylor C . PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(6):685-688. PMC: 7365738. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6. View

5.
Hu C, Ding L, Jiang C, Ma C, Liu B, Li D . Effects of Management, Dietary Intake, and Genotype on Rumen Morphology, Fermentation, and Microbiota, and on Meat Quality in Yaks and Cattle. Front Nutr. 2021; 8:755255. PMC: 8632495. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.755255. View