» Articles » PMID: 36210998

Alterations of Renal Function in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A BOLD and DTI Study

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 10
PMID 36210998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Our study aims to determine the patterns of renal oxygenation changes and microstructural changes by BOLD and DTI with deteriorating kidney function in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

Methods: Seventy-two patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and twenty healthy controls (HCs) underwent laboratory examinations, and renal BOLD and DTI images were obtained on a 3T-MRI machine. 2 , fractional anisotropy (FA), and average diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluated. DM patients were divided into three subgroups (Group-DI/DII/DIII, based on urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR)) and a nondiabetic kidney disease group (Group-NDKD). D-value and MCR of 2 and FA were proposed to evaluate the differentiation between medulla and cortex of the individual kidney among HCs and three subgroups for reducing individual differences. Comparisons were made between NDKD and kidney function-matched DKD patients. Correlations between MRI parameters and renal clinical indices were analyzed.

Results: Compared with Group-HC/DI, medullary 2 and FA values were significantly different in Group-DII/III. The D-value of 2 and FA in Group-III were significantly smaller than that in Group-HC. However, only MCR of 2 in Group-III was significantly smaller than that in HCs. Medullary 2 and FA were negatively associated with serum creatinine (SCr) and cystatin C (Cys C) and positively associated with eGFR.

Conclusions: With renal function declining, BOLD and DTI could capture alterations including the first rising and then falling medullary 2 , continuously declining medullary FA, and apparent cortex-medullary differentiation in DKD patients. The MRI parameters showed renal changes accompanied by varying degrees of albuminuria, sharing common involvement in DKD and NDKD patients, but it was hard to distinguish between them. BOLD seemed more sensitive than DTI in identifying renal cortex-medullary differentiation.

Citing Articles

Assessing early tubular protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin against type 2 diabetes mellitus using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Zhang C, Zhu B, Feng Y, Cheng Z, Cai X, Feng L Acta Diabetol. 2023; 61(4):473-483.

PMID: 38117325 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-023-02220-x.


The value of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhou X, Liu S, Yu J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1226830.

PMID: 37484949 PMC: 10360195. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1226830.


Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals dysfunction of the paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

Chen J, Huang Y, Zeng X, Ma J, Huang X, Liang H Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(6):3416-3427.

PMID: 37284106 PMC: 10240002. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1106.

References
1.
Branten A, Vervoort G, Wetzels J . Serum creatinine is a poor marker of GFR in nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20(4):707-11. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh719. View

2.
Emre T, Kilickesmez O, Buker A, Inal B, Dogan H, Ecder T . Renal function and diffusion-weighted imaging: a new method to diagnose kidney failure before losing half function. Radiol Med. 2015; 121(3):163-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0579-0. View

3.
Ries M, Jones R, Basseau F, Moonen C, Grenier N . Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14(1):42-9. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1149. View

4.
Eckardt K, Bernhardt W, Weidemann A, Warnecke C, Rosenberger C, Wiesener M . Role of hypoxia in the pathogenesis of renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005; (99):S46-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09909.x. View

5.
Soininen P, Kangas A, Wurtz P, Suna T, Ala-Korpela M . Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015; 8(1):192-206. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000216. View