» Articles » PMID: 36210982

Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Complex Texture Clustering Driven by Computational Intelligence Methods Using Multiple Clustering Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 10
PMID 36210982
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditional texture cluster algorithms are frequently used in engineering; however, despite their widespread application, these algorithms continue to suffer from drawbacks including excessive complexity and limited universality. This study will focus primarily on the analysis of the performance of a number of different texture clustering algorithms. In addition, the performance of traditional texture classification algorithms will be compared in terms of image size, clustering number, running time, and accuracy. Finally, the performance boundaries of various algorithms will be determined in order to determine where future improvements to these algorithms should be concentrated. In the experiment, some traditional clustering algorithms are used as comparative tools for performance analysis. The qualitative and quantitative data both show that there is a significant difference in performance between the different algorithms. It is only possible to achieve better performance by selecting the appropriate algorithm based on the characteristics of the texture image.

Citing Articles

Localized Simple Multiple Kernel K-Means Clustering with Matrix-Induced Regularization.

Qiu J, Xu H, Zhu X, Adjeisah M Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023; 2023:6654304.

PMID: 36970247 PMC: 10038733. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6654304.

References
1.
Guo Z, Zhang L, Zhang D . A completed modeling of local binary pattern operator for texture classification. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2010; 19(6):1657-63. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2044957. View

2.
Zhou F, Chen Q, Liu B, Qiu G . Structure and Texture-Aware Image Decomposition via Training a Neural Network. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2020; . DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2961232. View

3.
Liu X, Langer D, Haider M, Yang Y, Wernick M, Yetik I . Prostate cancer segmentation with simultaneous estimation of Markov random field parameters and class. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28(6):906-15. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2012888. View

4.
PAGET R, Longstaff I . Texture synthesis via a noncausal nonparametric multiscale Markov random field. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008; 7(6):925-31. DOI: 10.1109/83.679446. View

5.
Ohi M, Li Y, Cheng Y, Walz T . Negative Staining and Image Classification - Powerful Tools in Modern Electron Microscopy. Biol Proced Online. 2004; 6:23-34. PMC: 389902. DOI: 10.1251/bpo70. View