» Articles » PMID: 36209135

Spatial Structure of City Population Growth

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 8
PMID 36209135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We show here that population growth, resolved at the county level, is spatially heterogeneous both among and within the U.S. metropolitan statistical areas. Our analysis of data for over 3,100 U.S. counties reveals that annual population flows, resulting from domestic migration during the 2015-2019 period, are much larger than natural demographic growth, and are primarily responsible for this heterogeneous growth. More precisely, we show that intra-city flows are generally along a negative population density gradient, while inter-city flows are concentrated in high-density core areas. Intra-city flows are anisotropic and generally directed towards external counties of cities, driving asymmetrical urban sprawl. Such domestic migration dynamics are also responsible for tempering local population shocks by redistributing inflows within a given city. This spill-over effect leads to a smoother population dynamics at the county level, in contrast to that observed at the city level. Understanding the spatial structure of domestic migration flows is a key ingredient for analyzing their drivers and consequences, thus representing a crucial knowledge for urban policy makers and planners.

Citing Articles

The angiogenic growth of cities.

Capel-Timms I, Levinson D, Lahoorpoor B, Bonetti S, Manoli G J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(213):20230657.

PMID: 38565159 PMC: 10987239. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0657.

References
1.
Johnson K, Winkler R . Migration signatures across the decades: Net migration by age in U.S. counties, 1950-2010. Demogr Res. 2017; 32:1065-1080. PMC: 5649354. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.38. View

2.
Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kuhnert C, West G . Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(17):7301-6. PMC: 1852329. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610172104. View

3.
Bettencourt L . The origins of scaling in cities. Science. 2013; 340(6139):1438-41. DOI: 10.1126/science.1235823. View

4.
Bettencourt L, West G . A unified theory of urban living. Nature. 2010; 467(7318):912-3. DOI: 10.1038/467912a. View

5.
Stier A, Schertz K, Rim N, Cardenas-Iniguez C, Lahey B, Bettencourt L . Reply to Huth et al.: Cities are defined by their spatially aggregated socioeconomic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(2). PMC: 8764689. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2119313118. View