» Articles » PMID: 36207422

3D Measurement Techniques for the Hindfoot Alignment Angle from Weight-bearing CT in a Clinical Population

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Oct 7
PMID 36207422
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans now enable accurate measurements on foot skeletal structures with the advantage of observing these in 3D and in weight-bearing. Among the most common skeletal deformities, the varus/valgus of the hindfoot is the most complex to be represented, and a number of measure proposals have been published. This study aims to analyze and to compare these measurements from CBCT scans in a real clinical population with large such deformity. Ten patients with severe acquired adult flatfoot and indication for surgery underwent CBCT scans (Carestream, USA) while standing on that leg, before and after surgical correction. Corresponding 3D shape of each bone of the distal shank and hindfoot were defined (Materialise, Belgium). Six different techniques from the literature were used to calculate the varus/valgus deformity, i.e. the inclination of the hindfoot in the frontal plane of the shank. Standard clinical measurements by goniometers were taken for comparison. According to these techniques, and starting from a careful 3D reconstruction of the relevant foot skeletal structures, a large spectrum of measurements was found to represent the same hindfoot alignment angle. Most of them were very different from the traditional clinical measures. The assessment of the pre-operative valgus deformity and of the corresponding post-operative correction varied considerably. CBCT finally allows 3D assessment of foot deformities in weight-bearing. Measurements from the different available techniques do not compare well, as they are based on very different approaches. It is recommended to be aware of the anatomical and functional concepts behind these techniques before clinical and surgical conclusions.

Citing Articles

Trends in the Use of Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

Bernasconi A, Dechir Y, Izzo A, DAgostino M, Magliulo P, Smeraglia F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39337007 PMC: 11432607. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185519.


Implementing automated 3D measurements to quantify reference values and side-to-side differences in the ankle syndesmosis.

Peiffer M, Van den Borre I, Segers T, Ashkani-Esfahani S, Guss D, de Cesar Netto C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13774.

PMID: 37612321 PMC: 10447572. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40599-3.

References
1.
Gutteck N, Schilde S, Delank K, Arbab D . [Etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostics and conservative treatment of adult flatfoot]. Orthopade. 2020; 49(11):942-953. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-03995-5. View

2.
Bucking T, Hill E, Robertson J, Maneas E, Plumb A, Nikitichev D . From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0178540. PMC: 5451060. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178540. View

3.
Johnson J, Lamdan R, Granberry W, Harris G, Carrera G . Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(12):818-25. DOI: 10.1177/107110079902001212. View

4.
Kido M, Ikoma K, Imai K, Maki M, Takatori R, Tokunaga D . Load response of the tarsal bones in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 32(11):1017-22. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1017. View

5.
Caravaggi P, Sforza C, Leardini A, Portinaro N, Panou A . Effect of plano-valgus foot posture on midfoot kinematics during barefoot walking in an adolescent population. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018; 11:55. PMC: 6167855. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-018-0297-7. View