» Articles » PMID: 36203757

Non-conventional Interventions to Prevent Gonorrhea or Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Scoping Review

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 7
PMID 36203757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We assessed nonconventional interventions that did not traditionally focus on increasing condom use and/or testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) and the evidence for these interventions.

Methods: Guided by the Participants, Concept and Context (PCC) framework, we searched five online databases from inception to 9 August 2021 for original research on interventions that do not focus on increasing condom use and/or testing to prevent gonorrhea and/or syphilis in MSM. Two researchers screened titles and abstracts to assess eligibility, reviewed articles' full text and resolved discrepancies through discussion. We charted relevant study information, and the included studies were critically appraised.

Results: Of 373 articles retrieved, 13 studies were included. These studies were conducted in Australia ( = 3), Belgium ( = 2), China ( = 3), the Netherlands ( = 1) and the US ( = 4). Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of doxycycline as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) reduced any STI incidence (gonorrhea, syphilis, or chlamydia), but only doxycycline PEP significantly reduced syphilis incidence. Six studies of interventions that facilitated self-collection, self-examination, and self-testing, found varied evidence for gonorrhea and/or syphilis prevention. Four RCTs and one single-arm trial examined the efficacy of mouthwash, but the evidence remains inconclusive on whether mouthwash use can prevent transmission between men.

Conclusion: We found evidence for doxycycline PEP in reducing syphilis incidence, evidence on the use of mouthwash to prevent gonorrhea transmission between men remains inconclusive. More evidence is needed for interventions that do not focus on increasing condom use and/or testing to prevent gonorrhea and/or syphilis.

Citing Articles

Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.

Carroll J, Mullens A, Warzywoda S, Baker P, Stafford M, McMillan F PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317669.

PMID: 39913625 PMC: 11801728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317669.


Modelling of doxycycline-based prevention of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in comparison to condom-based and test-based prevention.

Hahn A, Frickmann H, Loderstadt U Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2024; 14(1):50-58.

PMID: 38289395 PMC: 10895362. DOI: 10.1556/1886.2023.00059.

References
1.
Peel J, Chow E, Denham I, Schmidt T, Buchanan A, Fairley C . Clinical Presentation of Incident Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Taking HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Melbourne, Australia. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 73(4):e934-e937. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab052. View

2.
Long L, Abraham C, Paquette R, Shahmanesh M, Llewellyn C, Townsend A . Brief interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections suitable for in-service use: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2016; 91:364-382. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.038. View

3.
Callander D, Guy R, Fairley C, McManus H, Prestage G, Chow E . Gonorrhoea gone wild: rising incidence of gonorrhoea and associated risk factors among gay and bisexual men attending Australian sexual health clinics. Sex Health. 2018; 16(5):457-463. DOI: 10.1071/SH18097. View

4.
Swanton R, Allom V, Mullan B . A meta-analysis of the effect of new-media interventions on sexual-health behaviours. Sex Transm Infect. 2014; 91(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051743. View

5.
Mohammed H, Blomquist P, Ogaz D, Duffell S, Furegato M, Checchi M . 100 years of STIs in the UK: a review of national surveillance data. Sex Transm Infect. 2018; 94(8):553-558. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053273. View