Reliability and Predictive Validity of Two Scales of Self-rated Health in China: Results from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2022 Oct 5

PMID 36199057

Authors

Yuwei Pan

Jitka Pikhartova

Martin Bobak

Hynek Pikhart

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of the single item self-rated health (SRH) question, its reliability has never been evaluated in Chinese population.

Methods: We used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, waves 1-4 (2011-2019). In wave 1, the same SRH question was asked twice, separated by other questions, on a subset of 4533 subjects, allowing us to examine the test-retest reliability of SRH. In addition, two versions of SRH questions (the WHO and US versions) were asked (n = 11,429). Kappa (κ), weighted kappa ([Formula: see text]), and polychoric correlation coefficient (ρ) were used for reliability assessment. Cox proportional-hazards models were estimated to assess the predictive validity of SRH measurement for mortality over 7 years of follow up. To do so, relative index of inequality (RII) and slope index of inequality (SII) were estimated for each SRH scale.

Results: There was moderate to substantial test-retest reliability (κ = 0.54, [Formula: see text]=0.63) of SRH; 31% of respondents who used the same scale twice changed their ratings after answering other questions. There was strong positive association between the two SRH measured by the two scales (ρ > 0.8). Compared with excellent/very good SRH, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of death are 2.30 (95% CI, 1.70-3.13) for the US version and 1.86 (95% CI, 1.33-2.60) for the WHO version. Using slope indices of inequality, the WHO version estimated slightly larger mortality differences (RII = 3.50, SII = 15.53) than the US version (RII = 3.25, SII = 14.80).

Conclusions: In Chinese middle-aged and older population, the reliability of SRH is generally good, although the two commonly used versions of SRH scales could not be compared directly. Both indices predict mortality, with similar predictive validity.

Citing Articles

EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-S: Which is the Better Instrument for Capturing Spillover Effects in Parental Carers of Children with COVID-19?.

Zhou W, Ding B, Busschbach J, Herdman M, Yang Z, Lu Y Pharmacoeconomics. 2025; .

PMID: 39907985 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01473-4.

Identifying the Relationship Between Residential Type and Health Outcomes of the Community-Dwelling Thai Older Adults in the Baseline Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mulati N, Aung M, Moolphate S, Aung T, Koyanagi Y, Supakankunti S Geriatrics (Basel). 2024; 9(6).

PMID: 39584944 PMC: 11586990. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9060143.

The effect of long-term care insurance on women's health outcomes in China: evidence from a disability inclusion action.

Jiang W, Yang H BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2262.

PMID: 39164684 PMC: 11337582. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19800-3.

Gender and age variations in the association between multigenerational cohabitation and self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults in Japan.

Nogimura A, Otani T, Noguchi T, Nakagawa-Senda H, Watanabe M, Yamada T Nagoya J Med Sci. 2024; 86(2):262-279.

PMID: 38962421 PMC: 11219238. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.86.2.262.

Sibling Availability, Sibling Sorting, and Subjective Health Among Chinese Adults.

Wang H, Verdery A, Margolis R Demography. 2024; 61(3):797-827.

PMID: 38814170 PMC: 11823426. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-11376831.

References

Zajacova A, Dowd J . Reliability of self-rated health in US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174(8):977-83. PMC: 3218632. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr204. View

Chandola T, Jenkinson C . Validating self-rated health in different ethnic groups. Ethn Health. 2000; 5(2):151-9. DOI: 10.1080/713667451. View

Cousins S . Validity and reliability of self-reported health of persons aged 70 and older. Health Care Women Int. 1997; 18(2):165-74. DOI: 10.1080/07399339709516271. View

Idler E, Benyamini Y . Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997; 38(1):21-37. View

de Bruin A, Picavet H, Nossikov A . Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1996; 58:i-xiii, 1-161. View

Bowling A, Windsor J . The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 62(1):81-5. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.058214. View

Appels A, Bosma H, Grabauskas V, Gostautas A, Sturmans F . Self-rated health and mortality in a Lithuanian and a Dutch population. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 42(5):681-9. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00195-6. View

Dowd J, Zajacova A . Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US?. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36(6):1214-21. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym214. View

DeSalvo K, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P . Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 21(3):267-75. PMC: 1828094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x. View

10.

Jurges H, Avendano M, Mackenbach J . Are different measures of self-rated health comparable? An assessment in five European countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008; 23(12):773-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-008-9287-6. View

11.

Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski B, Hrobjartsson A . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 64(1):96-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002. View

12.

Mackenbach J, Kunst A . Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(6):757-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1. View

13.

Lundberg O, Manderbacka K . Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health. Scand J Soc Med. 1996; 24(3):218-24. DOI: 10.1177/140349489602400314. View

14.

Huisman M, van Lenthe F, Mackenbach J . The predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality in different educational groups. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36(6):1207-13. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym095. View

15.

Lima-Costa M, Cesar C, Chor D, Proietti F . Self-rated health compared with objectively measured health status as a tool for mortality risk screening in older adults: 10-year follow-up of the Bambuí Cohort Study of Aging. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 175(3):228-35. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr290. View

16.

Kaplan G, Goldberg D, Everson S, Cohen R, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J . Perceived health status and morbidity and mortality: evidence from the Kuopio ischaemic heart disease risk factor study. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25(2):259-65. DOI: 10.1093/ije/25.2.259. View

17.

Schnittker J, Bacak V . The increasing predictive validity of self-rated health. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84933. PMC: 3899056. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084933. View

18.

Jylha M . What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69(3):307-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013. View

19.

Moller L, Kristensen T, Hollnagel H . Self rated health as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Copenhagen, Denmark. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996; 50(4):423-8. PMC: 1060313. DOI: 10.1136/jech.50.4.423. View

20.

Sargent-Cox K, Anstey K, Luszcz M . The choice of self-rated health measures matter when predicting mortality: evidence from 10 years follow-up of the Australian longitudinal study of ageing. BMC Geriatr. 2010; 10:18. PMC: 2868852. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-18. View