The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Overview
Pharmacology
Public Health
Affiliations
Objectives: We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) to evaluate how Medicare funding of inpatient COVID-19 treatments affected health equity in the United States.
Methods: A DCEA, based on an existing cost-effectiveness analysis model, was conducted from the perspective of a single US payer, Medicare. The US population was divided based on race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white) and county-level social vulnerability index (5 quintile groups) into 15 equity-relevant subgroups. The baseline distribution of quality-adjusted life expectancy was estimated across the equity subgroups. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total spend on COVID-19 inpatient treatments into health losses, expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), using base-case assumptions of an opportunity cost threshold of $150 000 per QALY gained and an equal distribution of opportunity costs across equity-relevant subgroups.
Results: More socially vulnerable populations received larger per capita health benefits due to higher COVID-19 incidence and baseline in-hospital mortality. The total direct medical cost of inpatient COVID-19 interventions in the United States in 2020 was estimated at $25.83 billion with an estimated net benefit of 735 569 QALYs after adjusting for opportunity costs. Funding inpatient COVID-19 treatment reduced the population-level burden of health inequality by 0.234%. Conclusions remained robust across scenario and sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DCEA to quantify the equity implications of funding COVID-19 treatments in the United States. Medicare funding of COVID-19 treatments in the United States could improve overall health while reducing existing health inequalities.
Shafrin J, Kim J, Cohen J, Garrison L, Goldman D, Doshi J Forum Health Econ Policy. 2024; 27(1):29-116.
PMID: 39512185 PMC: 11567015. DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2024-0014.
Modeling the Population Equity of Alzheimer Disease Treatments in the US.
Synnott P, Majda T, Lin P, Ollendorf D, Zhu Y, Kowal S JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2442353.
PMID: 39480421 PMC: 11528311. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42353.
Kowal S, Rosettie K Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 43(1):67-82.
PMID: 39388034 PMC: 11724795. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1.
Elvidge J, Hopkin G, Narayanan N, Nicholls D, Dawoud D Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1291164.
PMID: 38035028 PMC: 10687367. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1291164.
Jansen J, Ragavan M, Chen C, Douglas M, Phillips K Value Health. 2023; 26(12):1697-1710.
PMID: 37741446 PMC: 10859998. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.010.