» Articles » PMID: 36191229

Teeth, Prenatal Growth Rates, and the Evolution of Human-like Pregnancy in Later

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Oct 3
PMID 36191229
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence of how gestational parameters evolved is essential to understanding this fundamental stage of human life. Until now, these data seemed elusive given the skeletal bias of the fossil record. We demonstrate that dentition provides a window into the life of neonates. Teeth begin to form in utero and are intimately associated with gestational development. We measured the molar dentition for 608 catarrhine primates and collected data on prenatal growth rate (PGR) and endocranial volume (ECV) for 19 primate genera from the literature. We found that PGR and ECV are highly correlated ( = 0.93, < 0.001). Additionally, we demonstrated that molar proportions are significantly correlated with PGR ( = 0.004) and log-transformed ECV ( = 0.001). From these correlations, we developed two methods for reconstructing PGR in the fossil record, one using ECV and one using molar proportions. Dental proportions reconstruct hominid ECV ( = 0.81, < 0.001), a result that can be extrapolated to PGR. As teeth dominate fossil assemblages, our findings greatly expand our ability to investigate life history in the fossil record. Fossil ECVs and dental measurements from 13 hominid species both support significantly increasing PGR throughout the terminal Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene, reflecting known evolutionary changes. Together with pelvic and endocranial morphology, reconstructed PGRs indicate the need for increasing maternal energetics during pregnancy over the last 6 million years, reaching a human-like PGR (i.e., more similar to humans than to other extant apes) and ECV in later less than 1 million years ago.

Citing Articles

3.3 million years of stone tool complexity suggests that cumulative culture began during the Middle Pleistocene.

Paige J, Perreault C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(26):e2319175121.

PMID: 38885385 PMC: 11214059. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319175121.


The evolution of human altriciality and brain development in comparative context.

Gomez-Robles A, Nicolaou C, Smaers J, Sherwood C Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 8(1):133-146.

PMID: 38049480 PMC: 10781642. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02253-z.


A biphasic relational approach to the evolution of human consciousness: Un enfoque relacional bifásico para la evolución de la conciencia humana.

Hayes S, Hofmann S Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023; 23(4):100380.

PMID: 36937548 PMC: 10017357. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100380.

References
1.
Elton S, Bishop L, Wood B . Comparative context of Plio-Pleistocene hominin brain evolution. J Hum Evol. 2001; 41(1):1-27. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2001.0475. View

2.
White T, Lovejoy C, Asfaw B, Carlson J, Suwa G . Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(16):4877-84. PMC: 4413341. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403659111. View

3.
Dirks W, Bowman J . Life history theory and dental development in four species of catarrhine primates. J Hum Evol. 2007; 53(3):309-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.04.007. View

4.
Dean C, Leakey M, Reid D, Schrenk F, Schwartz G, Stringer C . Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature. 2001; 414(6864):628-31. DOI: 10.1038/414628a. View

5.
Harvey P, Clutton-Brock T . LIFE HISTORY VARIATION IN PRIMATES. Evolution. 2017; 39(3):559-581. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00395.x. View