» Articles » PMID: 36190954

Reduced Choice-confidence in Negative Numerals

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Oct 3
PMID 36190954
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Negative numbers are central in math. However, they are abstract, hard to learn, and manipulated slower than positive numbers regardless of math ability. It suggests that confidence, namely the post-decision estimate of being correct, should be lower than positives. We asked participants to pick the larger single-digit numeral in a pair and collected their implicit confidence with button pressure (button pressure was validated with three empirical signatures of confidence). We also modeled their choices with a drift-diffusion decision model to compute the post-decision estimate of being correct. We found that participants had relatively low confidence with negative numerals. Given that participants compared with high accuracy the basic base-10 symbols (0-9), reduced confidence may be a general feature of manipulating abstract negative numerals as they produce more uncertainty than positive numerals per unit of time.

References
1.
Ratcliff R . Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014; 40(2):870-88. PMC: 4009707. DOI: 10.1037/a0034954. View

2.
Vo V, Li R, Kornell N, Pouget A, Cantlon J . Young children bet on their numerical skills: metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25(9):1712-21. PMC: 4217213. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614538458. View

3.
Schneider M, Siegler R . Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 36(5):1227-38. DOI: 10.1037/a0018170. View

4.
Miklashevsky A, Lindemann O, Fischer M . The Force of Numbers: Investigating Manual Signatures of Embodied Number Processing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 14:590508. PMC: 7829181. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.590508. View

5.
Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A . Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(10):1292-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2635. View