» Articles » PMID: 36190343

Non-trough Adalimumab and Certolizumab Drug Levels Associated with a Therapeutic EULAR Response in Adherent Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2022 Oct 3
PMID 36190343
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Interventions aimed at increasing TNF-α inhibitor serum drug levels (SDLs) may improve treatment response; however, previous studies suggesting SDL cut-offs have not accounted for treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between adalimumab/certolizumab SDLs and EULAR good vs non-/moderate response and to define SDL cut-offs associated with good response in fully adherent patients.

Methods: In a prospective observational study, 475 patients with RA were treated with certolizumab (n = 192) or adalimumab (n = 283). At baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months, patients had 28-joint DAS, self-reported treatment adherence and SDLs measured. Fully adherent patients were analysed as a subgroup. Follow-up data at 3, 6 and 12 months were analysed separately. Median SDLs were compared in good vs non-/moderate response patients and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to establish cut-off SDLs.

Results: Fully adherent good responders had significantly higher median adalimumab/certolizumab SDLs compared with non-/moderate responders (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0005, respectively). ROC analysis reported 3 month non-trough adalimumab SDLs discriminated good vs non-/moderate response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% CI 0.52, 0.75), with a cut-off of 7.5 mg/l being 39.1% specific and 80.9% sensitive. Similarly, 3 month non-trough certolizumab SDLs discriminated good vs non-/moderate response with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.51, 0.78), with a cut-off of 26.0 mg/l being 43.9% specific and 77.8% sensitive.

Conclusion: In fully adherent patients, higher SDLs are detected in good responders, suggesting that interventions to improve SDLs, such as encouraging adherence, could improve treatment response. The 3 month non-trough SDL cut-offs of 7.5 mg/l for adalimumab and 26.0 mg/l for certolizumab may be useful in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic serum level for adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: explorative analyses of data from a randomised phase III trial.

Gehin J, Klaasen R, Kristianslund E, Jyssum I, Sexton J, Warren D RMD Open. 2024; 10(4).

PMID: 39537558 PMC: 11575345. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004888.


Psoriatic arthritis: the role of self-reported non-adherence, non-trough drug levels, immunogenicity and conventional synthetic DMARD co-therapy in adalimumab and etanercept response.

Curry P, Morris A, Jani M, Chinoy H, Barton A, Bluett J Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024; 8(1):rkae014.

PMID: 38415954 PMC: 10898332. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae014.


Prospective study to characterize adalimumab exposure in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases.

Welzel T, Golhen K, Atkinson A, Gotta V, Ternant D, Kuemmerle-Deschner J Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2024; 22(1):5.

PMID: 38167019 PMC: 10763375. DOI: 10.1186/s12969-023-00930-8.


Non-trough serum drug levels of adalimumab and etanercept are associated with response in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Curry P, Hum R, Morris A, Jani M, Chinoy H, Barton A Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023; .

PMID: 38070158 PMC: 11701324. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead666.


Adalimumab serum levels and anti-drug antibodies: associations to treatment response and drug survival in inflammatory joint diseases.

Jyssum I, Gehin J, Sexton J, Kristianslund E, Hu Y, Warren D Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023; 63(6):1746-1755.

PMID: 37773994 PMC: 11147536. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead525.

References
1.
Rispens T, de Vrieze H, de Groot E, Wouters D, Stapel S, Wolbink G . Antibodies to constant domains of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: anti-hinge antibodies in immunogenicity testing. J Immunol Methods. 2011; 375(1-2):93-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.09.011. View

2.
Bluett J, Morgan C, Thurston L, Plant D, Hyrich K, Morgan A . Impact of inadequate adherence on response to subcutaneously administered anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs: results from the Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Genetics and Genomics Study Syndicate cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014; 54(3):494-9. PMC: 4334684. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu358. View

3.
van Schouwenburg P, Bartelds G, Hart M, Aarden L, Wolbink G, Wouters D . A novel method for the detection of antibodies to adalimumab in the presence of drug reveals "hidden" immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Immunol Methods. 2010; 362(1-2):82-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.09.005. View

4.
Li P, Blum M, Von Feldt J, Hennessy S, Doshi J . Adherence, discontinuation, and switching of biologic therapies in medicaid enrollees with rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2010; 13(6):805-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00764.x. View

5.
Jani M, Chinoy H, Barton A . Association of Pharmacological Biomarkers with Treatment Response and Longterm Disability in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from OUTPASS. J Rheumatol. 2019; 47(8):1204-1208. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.190253. View