Automated Measurement of Endometrial Peristalsis in Cine Transvaginal Ultrasound Images

Overview

Journal Front Physiol

Date 2022 Oct 3

PMID 36187777

Authors

Yue Wang

Xiaokun Li

Niya Wei

Yuanxi Liu

Xinting Liu

Ruijie Sun

Chan Huang

Bin Yao

Huifang Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Endometrial peristalsis (EP) in non-pregnant uterine can be assessed by visual assessment of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). However, visual assessment is subjective, and the outcome depends on the sonographers and video analysts. This study aimed to create a newly developed automatic analysis algorithm for measuring the EP compared to visual assessment. A retrospective analysis was performed using the datasets from fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), who underwent the evaluation of EP by TVUS within 5 days prior to transplantation. 158 cine TVUS images were used to develop the automated analysis algorithm, and 37 cine TVUS images were evaluated by both visual and automated analysis algorithms. The algorithm was developed by applying the optical flow technology and enabled objective analysis of the number, direction, and intensity of EP. The number of peristaltic waves counted by visual assessment was 4.2 ± 2.3 (mean ± standard deviation) and 4.1 ± 2.1 for doctors one and two, respectively. The number of waves counted with the algorithm was 3.6 ± 2.1 at first evaluation and 3.7 ± 2.0 at repeated evaluation. A significant difference was found between the algorithm count and visual assessment ( = 0.001, 0.002, 0.003, 0.008). The ICC values for algorithm versus manuals ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and 0.87 to 0.96. The numbers of the cervix-to-fundus (CF), fundus-to-cervix (FC), and both cervix-to-fundal and fundus-to-cervix (CF + FC) directions of EP counted by the algorithm were 50, 52, and 32, respectively. The numbers counted by visual assessment were 43, 45, and 46, respectively. The number of EP was the same in 87% of the two algorithm counts. The number was lower between the algorithm and visual analysis (79% with complete agreement). The EP intensity assessed by the algorithm was 2.6 ± 1.1, and the peristalsis velocity was 0.147 (0.07) mm/s. The fully automated analysis algorithm can be used to quantify uterine peristalsis comparable to visual assessment.

References

Kuijsters N, Sammali F, Rabotti C, Huang Y, Mischi M, Schoot B . Visual inspection of transvaginal ultrasound videos to characterize uterine peristalsis: an inter-observer agreement study. J Ultrasound. 2019; 23(1):37-44. PMC: 7010888. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-018-00356-z. View

Kido A, Ascher S, Kishimoto K, Hahn W, Jha R, Togashi K . Comparison of uterine peristalsis before and after uterine artery embolization at 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(6):1431-5. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5349. View

Kuijsters N, Methorst W, Kortenhorst M, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot B . Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(1):50-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.019. View

Nakai A, Reinhold C, Noel P, Kido A, Rafatzand K, Ito I . Optimizing cine MRI for uterine peristalsis: a comparison of three different single shot fast spin echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 38(1):161-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23946. View

Young R . Mechanotransduction mechanisms for coordinating uterine contractions in human labor. Reproduction. 2016; 152(2):R51-61. DOI: 10.1530/REP-16-0156. View

van Gestel I, Ijland M, Evers J, Hoogland H . Complex endometrial wave-patterns in IVF. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(3):612-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.050. View

Soares D, Junior H, Bittencourt L, Lopes F, de Oliveira M . The role of cine MR imaging in the assessment of uterine function. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300(3):545-553. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05222-9. View

Wray S, Burdyga T, Noble D, Noble K, Borysova L, Arrowsmith S . Progress in understanding electro-mechanical signalling in the myometrium. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014; 213(2):417-31. DOI: 10.1111/apha.12431. View

Watanabe K, Kataoka M, Yano K, Nishio S, Umehana M, Kido A . Automated detection and measurement of uterine peristalsis in cine MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 42(3):644-50. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24817. View

10.

Pinto V, Matteo M, Tinelli R, Mitola P, de Ziegler D, Cicinelli E . Altered uterine contractility in women with chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(4):1049-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.007. View

11.

Youssef A, Salsi G, Cataneo I, Martelli F, Azzarone C, Bellussi F . Agreement between two 3D ultrasound techniques for the assessment of the subpubic arch angle. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; :1-5. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1175000. View

12.

Liu S, Zhang Q, Yin C, Chen W, Chan Q, He J . An optimised repetition time (TR) for cine imaging of uterine peristalsis on 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol. 2018; 73(7):678.e7-678.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.012. View

13.

Morizaki N, Morizaki J, Hayashi R, Garfield R . A functional and structural study of the innervation of the human uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160(1):218-28. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90126-9. View