» Articles » PMID: 36180209

Improved Rapid Diagnostic Tests to Detect Syphilis and Yaws: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Current rapid tests for syphilis and yaws can detect treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. We aimed to critically appraise the literature for rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) which can better distinguish an active infection of syphilis or yaws.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching five databases between January 2010 and October 2021 (with an update in July 2022). A generalised linear mixed model was used to conduct a bivariate meta-analysis for the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

Results: We included 17 studies for meta-analyses. For syphilis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99), respectively. For yaws, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98), respectively.

Conclusions: RDTs that can differentiate between active and previously treated infections could optimise management by providing same-day treatment and reducing unnecessary treatment.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021279587.

Citing Articles

Syphilis testing, incidence, and reinfection among gay and bisexual men in Australia over a decade spanning HIV PrEP implementation: an analysis of surveillance data from 2012 to 2022.

Traeger M, Guy R, Taunton C, Chow E, Asselin J, Carter A Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024; 51:101175.

PMID: 39263009 PMC: 11387360. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101175.


The population-level impact of introducing rapid diagnostic tests on syphilis transmission in Canadian arctic communities - a mathematical modeling study.

Xia Y, Caya C, Morin V, Singh A, Serhir B, Libman M Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 37:100845.

PMID: 39100242 PMC: 11295708. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100845.

References
1.
Zorzi A, Cordioli M, Gios L, Del Bravo P, Toskin I, Peeling R . Field evaluation of two point-of-care tests for syphilis among men who have sex with men, Verona, Italy. Sex Transm Infect. 2017; 93(S4):S51-S58. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-053065. View

2.
Bossuyt P, Deeks J, Leeflang M, Takwoingi Y, Flemyng E . Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 7:ED000163. PMC: 10408284. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000163. View

3.
van Enst W, Ochodo E, Scholten R, Hooft L, Leeflang M . Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:70. PMC: 4035673. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-70. View

4.
McInnes M, Moher D, Thombs B, McGrath T, Bossuyt P, Clifford T . Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018; 319(4):388-396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. View

5.
Skinner L, Robertson G, Norton R . Evaluation of the Dual Path Platform syphilis point of care test in North Queensland. Pathology. 2015; 47(7):718-20. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000334. View