» Articles » PMID: 36176978

A Cross-Sectional Study of Various Imaging and Biochemical Biomarkers in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema in Different Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Sep 30
PMID 36176978
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare which imaging and biochemical biomarkers are associated with different stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Patients And Methods: It was a cross-sectional, observational study that included 100 patients of DME with different stages of DR. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A - DME with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and Group B - DME with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Group A was further subdivided into three subgroups: A (1) - DME with mild NPDR, A (2) - DME with moderate NPDR, and A (3) - DME with severe NPDR. The primary outcome measure was the association of imaging and biochemical biomarkers with different stages of DR in patients with DME.

Results: Out of 100 patients, Group A (1) had 1, Group A (2) 44, Group A (3) 29, and group: B had 29 patients. As Group A (1) had only one patient, we did not include it in the calculation. The overall mean age of the study population was 54.84+9.87 years, with a male preponderance (76%). The HbA1c levels, serum triglyceride level, serum cholesterol level, and microalbuminuria level showed no significant association with different stages of DR (P>0.05). Still, we found high serum urea levels (p=0.027) in Group B patients. The optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based imaging biomarkers - central subfield thickness (CST), cystoid macular edema (CME), subretinal fluid (SRF), and hyperreflective foci (HRF) - showed no significant association with various stages of DR. The presence of diffuse retinal thickness (DRT) (p=0.04) and the epiretinal membrane (ERM) (p=0.04) showed significant association with Group B patients.

Conclusion: The essential biochemical biomarkers such as serum urea levels and DRT and ERM may be considered an important imaging biomarker for the advanced stage of DR.

Citing Articles

Molecular-Genetic Biomarkers of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Andres-Blasco I, Gallego-Martinez A, Casaroli-Marano R, Di Lauro S, Arevalo J, Pinazo-Duran M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685883 PMC: 11642322. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237426.

References
1.
Knyazer B, Schachter O, Plakht Y, Serlin Y, Smolar J, Belfair N . Epiretinal membrane in diabetes mellitus patients screened by nonmydriatic fundus camera. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016; 51(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.09.016. View

2.
. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103(12):1796-806. View

3.
Ng C, Cheung N, Wang J, Islam A, Kawasaki R, Meuer S . Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population. Ophthalmology. 2010; 118(4):694-9. PMC: 3070851. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009. View

4.
Nathan D . The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37(1):9-16. PMC: 3867999. DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2112. View

5.
King P, Peacock I, Donnelly R . The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 48(5):643-8. PMC: 2014359. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00092.x. View