Is Staple Line Reinforcement Still Needed on Contemporary Staplers? A Benchtop Analysis

Overview

Journal Surg Endosc

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Radiology

Date 2022 Sep 29

PMID 36175699

Authors

Bipan Chand

Christen Meyers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is commonly used in bariatric surgeries to reduce leaks and bleeds. With the evolution of staplers, the need for buttressing with the latest surgical stapling technology is in question. The efficacy of GORE® SEAMGUARD® (G-SLR) to improve staple line strength based on an established measure of burst pressure was evaluated. A benchtop test on synthetic tissue evaluated the pressure required for staple line leak across surgical staplers with and without G-SLR.

Methods: Staple lines on a consistent thickness synthetic bowel were pressurized to the point of failure (burst pressure) among Ethicon®, Intuitive®, and Medtronic® surgical staplers with and without G-SLR. Burst pressure and leak location (through the staple line [TTSL] or through the staple [TTS], on the anvil or cartridge side) were recorded. Visual confirmation of a leak concluded each test.

Results: The pooled mean burst pressure for G-SLR was greater (p < 0.05) by 0.494 pounds/square inch compared with no reinforcement with no meaningful differences among staplers. Leak failures were primarily TTS (91.7%) and equally distributed between reinforcement groups with more leak failures on the cartridge side with G-SLR and on the anvil side for non-SLR group. Leaks occurred across the length of staple lines with no discernable pattern.

Conclusion: Employing a buttressing material strengthens the staple line, as measured by burst pressure, and may reduce the risk for staple line failure. This benchtop study of G-SLR with three commonly used surgical staplers demonstrated a significant increase in burst pressures among the studied stapling devices.

References

Gagner M, Buchwald J . Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014; 10(4):713-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. View

Shikora S, Mahoney C . Clinical Benefit of Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(7):1133-41. PMC: 4460272. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1703-x. View

Gagner M, Brown M . Update on Sleeve Gastrectomy Leak Rate with the Use of Reinforcement. Obes Surg. 2015; 26(1):146-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1899-9. View

Hoyuela C . Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for morbid obesity: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 9(4):109-117. PMC: 5406732. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i4.109. View

Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, Sejor E, Karam S, Amor I . Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: can we approach a 0% rate using the largest staple height with reinforcement all along the staple line? Short-term results and technical considerations. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; 14(12):1804-1810. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.028. View

Hajer A, Wolff S, Benedix F, Hukauf M, Manger T, Stroh C . Trends in Early Morbidity and Mortality after Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients over 60 Years : Retrospective Review and Data Analysis of the German Bariatric Surgery Registry. Obes Surg. 2018; 28(7):1831-1837. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3110-6. View

Gagner M, Kemmeter P . Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2019; 34(1):396-407. PMC: 6946737. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. View

Varban O, Thumma J, Finks J, Carlin A, Ghaferi A, Dimick J . Evaluating the Effect of Surgical Skill on Outcomes for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Video-based Study. Ann Surg. 2019; 273(4):766-771. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003385. View

Baker R, Foote J, Kemmeter P, Brady R, Vroegop T, Serveld M . The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004; 14(10):1290-8. DOI: 10.1381/0960892042583888. View

10.

Consten E, Gagner M, Pomp A, Inabnet W . Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg. 2004; 14(10):1360-6. DOI: 10.1381/0960892042583905. View

11.

Nguyen N, Longoria M, Welbourne S, Sabio A, Wilson S . Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005; 140(8):773-8. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.773. View

12.

Miller K, Pump A . Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007; 3(4):417-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.03.244. View

13.

Durmush E, Ermerak G, Durmush D . Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: does staple line reinforcement matter?. Obes Surg. 2014; 24(7):1109-16. PMC: 4046086. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1251-9. View

14.

Barreto T, Kemmeter P, Paletta M, Davis A . A comparison of a single center's experience with three staple line reinforcement techniques in 1,502 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients. Obes Surg. 2014; 25(3):418-22. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1432-6. View

15.

Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli E, Dutot C, Mercier G, Nocca D . Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients. Obes Surg. 2015; 26(8):1710-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1991-1. View

16.

Downey D, Harre J, Dolan J . Increased burst pressure in gastrointestinal staple-lines using reinforcement with a bioprosthetic material. Obes Surg. 2005; 15(10):1379-83. DOI: 10.1381/096089205774859254. View

17.

Arnold W, Shikora S . A comparison of burst pressure between buttressed versus non-buttressed staple-lines in an animal model. Obes Surg. 2005; 15(2):164-71. DOI: 10.1381/0960892053268309. View

18.

Elariny H, Gonzalez H, Wang B . Tissue thickness of human stomach measured on excised gastric specimens from obese patients. Surg Technol Int. 2006; 14:119-24. View

19.

Gagner M, Huang R . Comparison between orogastric tube/bougie and a suction calibration system for effects on operative duration, staple-line corkscrewing, and esophageal perforation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(4):1648-55. PMC: 4802001. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4399-z. View

20.

Haruma K, Wiste J, Camilleri M . Effect of octreotide on gastrointestinal pressure profiles in health and in functional and organic gastrointestinal disorders. Gut. 1994; 35(8):1064-9. PMC: 1375056. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.8.1064. View