» Articles » PMID: 36174077

Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis Composite Disease Activity Indices and Residual Activity in a Brazilian Multicenter Study- REAL Study

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice.

Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity.

Patients And Methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method.

Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%.

Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries.

References
1.
Gomides A, de Albuquerque C, Vargas Santos A, Balbino Chaves Amorim R, Bertolo M, Junior P . Causes of synthetic disease-modifying drug discontinuation in rheumatoid arthritis: Data from a large real-life cohort. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0213219. PMC: 6396919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213219. View

2.
Aletaha D, Smolen J . Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: missing objectives by using inadequate DAS28 targets. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019; 15(11):633-634. DOI: 10.1038/s41584-019-0279-6. View

3.
Mathew A, Danda D, Conaghan P . MRI and ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016; 28(3):323-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000282. View

4.
Olmez M, Gunal E, Bakirci Ureyen S, Keskin H, Ozturk A, Yeter G . Comparison of composite indices with global synovitis score on ultrasound for detecting remission. Clin Rheumatol. 2017; 37(4):1111-1114. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3925-x. View

5.
Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T . The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(7):1316-22. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627. View