» Articles » PMID: 36172995

"Post-" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The exceptionalism of abortion in public health education, due to social stigma, politicization, and lack of training, contributes to misinformation, policies unjustified by rigorous science, lack of access to person-centered health care, and systemic pregnancy-related inequities. Now that abortion access has vanished for large portions of the United States, following the Supreme Court decision in (), health educators must work to eliminate abortion-related silos, destigmatize abortion education, and bring comprehensive sexual and reproductive health information and evidence to the many audiences that will require it. We discuss consequences of abortion exceptionalism in health education for the public, health care providers, pregnant people, and health professionals in training-and opportunities to better and more accessibly provide sexual and reproductive health education to these audiences.

Citing Articles

"So that I can trust them with my body:" How people with low incomes who may become pregnant define and prioritize quality reproductive health care.

Newton-Levinson A, Blake S, Swartzendruber A, Kramer M, Sales J Contraception. 2024; 138:110517.

PMID: 38885892 PMC: 11365768. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110517.


My Health in My Hands: Improving Medication Abortion Knowledge and Closing Disparities with a Community-Led Media Intervention.

McMahon H, Serrano L, Vyavahare T, Hairston I, Ayala S, Jah Z Health Equity. 2024; 8(1):138-142.

PMID: 38435024 PMC: 10908321. DOI: 10.1089/heq.2023.0210.

References
1.
Redd S, Hall K, Aswani M, Sen B, Wingate M, Rice W . Variation in Restrictive Abortion Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes in the United States from 2005 to 2015. Womens Health Issues. 2021; 32(2):103-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.10.006. View

2.
Stevenson A . The Pregnancy-Related Mortality Impact of a Total Abortion Ban in the United States: A Research Note on Increased Deaths Due to Remaining Pregnant. Demography. 2021; 58(6):2019-2028. PMC: 10577877. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9585908. View

3.
Hardeman R, Karbeah J, Kozhimannil K . Applying a critical race lens to relationship-centered care in pregnancy and childbirth: An antidote to structural racism. Birth. 2019; 47(1):3-7. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12462. View

4.
Mann E, Chen A, Johnson C . Doctor knows best? Provider bias in the context of contraceptive counseling in the United States. Contraception. 2021; 110:66-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.009. View

5.
Steinauer J, Turk J, Pomerantz T, Simonson K, Learman L, Landy U . Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219(1):86.e1-86.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.011. View