» Articles » PMID: 36171350

An Update on Epidural Steroid Injections: is There Still a Role for Particulate Corticosteroids?

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2022 Sep 28
PMID 36171350
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) play an important role in the multifaceted management of neck and back pain. Corticosteroid preparations used in ESIs may be considered "particulate" or "non-particulate" based on whether they form a crystalline suspension or a soluble clear solution, respectively. In the past two decades, there have been reports of rare but severe and permanent neurological complications as a result of ESI. These complications have principally occurred with particulate corticosteroid preparations when using a transforaminal injection technique at cervical or thoracic levels, and only rarely in the lumbosacral spine. As a result, some published clinical guidelines and recommendations have advised against the use of particulate corticosteroids for transforaminal ESI, and the FDA introduced a warning label for injectable corticosteroids regarding the risk of serious neurological adverse events. There is growing evidence that the efficacy of non-particulate corticosteroids for pain relief and functional improvement after ESI is non-inferior to particulate agents, and that non-particulate injections almost never result in permanent neurological injury. Despite this, particulate corticosteroids continue to be routinely used for transforaminal epidural injections. More consistent clinical guidelines and societal recommendations are required alongside increased awareness of the comparative efficacy of non-particulate agents among specialists who perform ESIs. The current role for particulate corticosteroids in ESIs should be limited to caudal and interlaminar approaches, or transforaminal injections in the lumbar spine only if initial non-particulate ESI resulted in a significant but short-lived improvement.

Citing Articles

Comparing the clinical efficacy of preganglionic and preganglionic plus ganglionic transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain.

Goksu H, Celik S, Akcaboy E, Sahin S, Baran M, Yildiz G Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025; 30(1):44-48.

PMID: 39800417 PMC: 11753591. DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2025.1.20240064.


Indication and Technical Consideration for Nerve Blocks and Neurolysis for Pain Control.

Orkut S, Cazzato R, Garnon J, Koch G, Autrusseau P, De Marini P Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39707010 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03934-3.


Response to the Letter to the Editor: Comparison of efficacy between transforaminal epidural steroid injection technique without contrast versus with contrast in lumbar radiculopathy: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Pholsawatchai W, Manakul P, Lertcheewanan W, Siribumrungwoung K, Suntharapa T, Arunakul R Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(3):485-486.

PMID: 38961797 PMC: 11222886. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0177.r2.


Letter to the Editor: Comparison of efficacy between transforaminal epidural steroid injection technique without contrast versus with contrast in lumbar radiculopathy: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Sacaklidir R Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(3):483-484.

PMID: 38961796 PMC: 11222890. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0177.r1.

References
1.
Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J . Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(6):299. PMC: 7186678. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175. View

2.
Martin B, Turner J, Mirza S, Lee M, Comstock B, Deyo R . Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(19):2077-84. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fad1. View

3.
Manchikanti L, Falco F, Pampati V, Cash K, Benyamin R, Hirsch J . Cost utility analysis of caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, axial or discogenic low back pain, central spinal stenosis, and post lumbar surgery syndrome. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(3):E129-43. View

4.
Manchikanti L, Boswell M, Hirsch J . Lessons learned in the abuse of pain-relief medication: a focus on healthcare costs. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013; 13(5):527-43. DOI: 10.1586/ern.13.33. View

5.
Christelis N, Simpson B, Russo M, Stanton-Hicks M, Barolat G, Thomson S . Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Proposal for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and ICD-11. Pain Med. 2021; 22(4):807-818. PMC: 8058770. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab015. View