» Articles » PMID: 36167520

Genetic Analysis of Yield Traits in Egyptian Cotton Crosses (Gossypium Barbdense L.) Under Normal Conditions

Overview
Journal BMC Plant Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36167520
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To generate high-yielding cultivars with favorable fiber quality traits, cotton breeders can use information about combining ability and gene activity within a population to locate elite parents and potential F1 crosses. To this end, in the current study, twelve cotton parents (eight genotypes as female parents and four testers) and their F1 crosses obtained utilizing the linex tester mating design were evaluated for their general and specialized combining abilities (GCA and SCA, respectively) of yield traits. The findings showed that for all the investigated variables, variances owing to genotypes, parents, crosses, and parent vs cross showed extremely significant (P ≤ 0.01) differences. Additionally, throughout the course of two growing seasons, the mean squares for genotypes (parents and crosses) showed strong significance for all the variables under study. The greatest and most desired means for all the examined qualities were in the parent G.94, Pima S6, and tester G.86. The best crossings for the qualities examined were G.86 (G.89 × G.86), G.93 × Suvin, and G.86 × Suvin. The parents' Suvin, G89x G86 and TNB were shown to have the most desired general combining ability effects for seed cotton yield/plant, lint yield/plant, boll weight, number of bolls/plants, and lint index, while Suvin, G.96 and pima S6 were preferred for favored lint percentage. For seed cotton yield, lint percentage, boll weight, and number of bolls per plant per year, the cross-G.86 x (G.89 × G.86) displayed highly significant specific combining ability impacts. The crosses G.86 × Suvin, Kar x TNB, G.93 × Suvin, and G.93 × TNB for all the studied traits for each year and their combined were found to have highly significant positive heterotic effects relative to better parent, and they could be used in future cotton breeding programs for improving the studied traits.

Citing Articles

Exploring agro-morphological and fiber traits diversity in cotton (G. barbadense L.).

Salama E, Farid M, El-Mahalawy Y, El-Akheder A, Aboshosha A, Fayed A BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):403.

PMID: 38750434 PMC: 11095005. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-04912-0.


Genetic improvement of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) for high yield and fiber quality properties under semi arid conditions.

Lamlom S, Yehia W, Kotb H, Abdelghany A, Shah A, Salama E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7723.

PMID: 38565894 PMC: 10987534. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57676-w.

References
1.
Tabussam N, Rana R, Wattoo F, Khan A, Amir R, Javed T . Single nucleotide polymorphism based assessment of genetic diversity in local and exotic onion genotypes. Mol Biol Rep. 2022; 49(6):5511-5520. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07431-z. View

2.
Choudhary R, Bairwa H, Kumar U, Javed T, Asad M, Lal K . Influence of organic manures on soil nutrient content, microbial population, yield and quality parameters of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266675. PMC: 9015131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266675. View

3.
Ghareeb R, Galal El-Din Shams El-Din N, El Maghraby D, Ibrahim D, Abdel-Megeed A, Abdelsalam N . Nematicidal activity of seaweed-synthesized silver nanoparticles and extracts against Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):3841. PMC: 8907182. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06600-1. View

4.
Elmardy N, Yousef A, Lin K, Zhang X, Ali M, Lamlom S . Photosynthetic performance of rocket (Eruca sativa. Mill.) grown under different regimes of light intensity, quality, and photoperiod. PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257745. PMC: 8476030. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257745. View

5.
Morsy M, Alakeel K, Ahmed A, Abbas A, Omara A, Abdelsalam N . Recycling rice straw ash to produce low thermal conductivity and moisture-resistant geopolymer adobe bricks. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022; 29(5):3759-3771. PMC: 9280309. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.02.046. View