» Articles » PMID: 36166287

Therapist-Delivered Versus Care Ally-Assisted Massage for Veterans With Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36166287
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is prevalent, and it reduces functional status and quality of life and is associated with deleterious psychological outcomes in affected individuals. Despite the desirability of massage and its demonstrated effectiveness in CNP treatment, multiple accessibility barriers exist. Caregiver-applied massage has demonstrated feasibility in various populations but has not been examined in Veterans with CNP or compared in parallel to therapist-delivered massage.

Objective: This manuscript described the original study design, lessons learned, and resultant design modifications for the Trial Outcomes for Massage: Care Ally-Assisted Versus Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT) study.

Methods: TOMCATT began as a 3-arm, randomized controlled trial of 2 massage delivery approaches for Veterans with CNP with measures collected at baseline, 1 and 3 months after intervention, and 6 months (follow-up). Arm I, care ally-assisted massage, consisted of an in-person, 3.5-hour training workshop, an instructional DVD, a printed treatment manual, and three 30-minute at-home care ally-assisted massage sessions weekly for 3 months. Arm II, therapist-treated massage, consisted of two 60-minute sessions tailored to individual pain experiences and treatments per week for 3 months. The treatments followed a standardized Swedish massage approach. Arm III consisted of wait-list control.

Results: Retention and engagement challenges in the first 30 months were significant in the care ally-assisted massage study arm (63% attrition between randomization and treatment initiation) and prompted modification to a 2-arm trial, that is, removing arm I.

Conclusions: The modified TOMCATT study successfully launched and exceeded recruitment goals 2.5 months before the necessary COVID-19 pause and is expected to be completed by early 2023.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03100539; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03100539.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/38950.

References
1.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

2.
Quinn C, Dunbar S, Clark P, Strickland O . Challenges and strategies of dyad research: cardiovascular examples. Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23(2):e15-20. PMC: 2861299. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2008.10.001. View

3.
Collinge W, Kahn J, Walton T, Kozak L, Bauer-Wu S, Fletcher K . Touch, Caring, and Cancer: randomized controlled trial of a multimedia caregiver education program. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 21(5):1405-14. PMC: 3612588. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1682-6. View

4.
Sherman K, Cook A, Wellman R, Hawkes R, Kahn J, Deyo R . Five-week outcomes from a dosing trial of therapeutic massage for chronic neck pain. Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12(2):112-20. PMC: 3948757. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1602. View

5.
Toussaint A, Murray A, Voigt K, Herzog A, Gierk B, Kroenke K . Development and Validation of the Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12). Psychosom Med. 2015; 78(1):5-12. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000240. View