» Articles » PMID: 36163372

Modelling Clinical DNA Fragmentation in the Development of Universal PCR-based Assays for Bisulfite-converted, Formalin-fixed and Cell-free DNA Sample Analysis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Sep 27
PMID 36163372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In fragmented DNA, PCR-based methods quantify the number of intact regions at a specific amplicon length. However, the relationship between the population of DNA fragments within a sample and the likelihood they will amplify has not been fully described. To address this, we have derived a mathematical equation that relates the distribution profile of a stochastically fragmented DNA sample to the probability that a DNA fragment within that sample can be amplified by any PCR assay of arbitrary length. Two panels of multiplex PCR assays for quantifying fragmented DNA were then developed: a four-plex panel that can be applied to any human DNA sample and used to estimate the percentage of regions that are intact at any length; and a two-plex panel optimized for quantifying circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). For these assays, regions of the human genome least affected by copy number aberration were identified and selected; within these copy-neutral regions, each PCR assay was designed to amplify both genomic and bisulfite-converted DNA; and all assays were validated for use in both conventional qPCR and droplet-digital PCR. Finally, using the cfDNA-optimized assays we find evidence of universally conserved nucleosome positioning among individuals.

Citing Articles

Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 Cycle Threshold Values: Multisite Investigation Evaluating Viral Quantitation across Multiple Commercial COVID-19 Detection Platforms.

Gavina K, Franco L, Robinson C, Hymas W, Lei G, Sinclair W Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 11(1):e0447022.

PMID: 36651781 PMC: 9927101. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04470-22.

References
1.
Lu J, Johnston A, Berichon P, Ru K, Korbie D, Trau M . PrimerSuite: A High-Throughput Web-Based Primer Design Program for Multiplex Bisulfite PCR. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41328. PMC: 5259761. DOI: 10.1038/srep41328. View

2.
Nikolaev S, Lemmens L, Koessler T, Blouin J, Nouspikel T . Circulating tumoral DNA: Preanalytical validation and quality control in a diagnostic laboratory. Anal Biochem. 2017; 542:34-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.11.004. View

3.
Georgiou C, Papapostolou I . Assay for the quantification of intact/fragmented genomic DNA. Anal Biochem. 2006; 358(2):247-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.035. View

4.
Van Loo P, Nordgard S, Lingjaerde O, Russnes H, Rye I, Sun W . Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(39):16910-5. PMC: 2947907. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009843107. View

5.
Ivanov M, Chernenko P, Breder V, Laktionov K, Rozhavskaya E, Musienko S . Utility of cfDNA Fragmentation Patterns in Designing the Liquid Biopsy Profiling Panels to Improve Their Sensitivity. Front Genet. 2019; 10:194. PMC: 6422983. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00194. View