» Articles » PMID: 36161543

Validation of the Flow Index to Detect Low Inspiratory Effort During Pressure Support Ventilation

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36161543
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bedside assessment of low levels of inspiratory effort, which are probably insufficient to prevent muscle atrophy, is challenging. The flow index, which is derived from the analysis of the inspiratory portion of the flow-time waveform, has been recently introduced as a non-invasive parameter to evaluate the inspiratory effort. The primary objective of the present study was to provide an external validation of the flow index to detect low inspiratory effort.

Methods: Datasets containing flow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure (P)-time waveforms were obtained from a previously published study in 100 acute brain-injured patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. Waveforms data were analyzed offline. A low inspiratory effort was defined by one of the following criteria, work of breathing (WOB) less than 0.3 J/L, P-time product (PTP) per minute less than 50 cmHO•s/min, or inspiratory muscle pressure (P) less than 5 cmHO, adding "or occurrence of ineffective effort more than 10%" for all criteria. The flow index was calculated according to previously reported method. The association of flow index with P-derived parameters of effort was investigated. The diagnostic accuracy of the flow index to detect low effort was analyzed.

Results: Moderate correlations were found between flow index and WOB, P, and PTP per breath and per minute (Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.546 to 0.634, P < 0.001). The incidence of low inspiratory effort was 62%, 51%, and 55% using the definition of WOB, PTP per minute, and P, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for flow index to diagnose low effort was 0.88, 0.81, and 0.88, for the three respective definition. By using the cutoff value of flow index less than 2.1, the diagnostic performance for the three definitions showed sensitivity of 0.95-0.96, specificity of 0.57-0.71, positive predictive value of 0.70-0.84, and negative predictive value of 0.90-0.93.

Conclusions: The flow index is associated with P-based inspiratory effort measurements. Flow index can be used as a valid instrument to screen low inspiratory effort with a high probability to exclude cases without the condition.

Citing Articles

A cluster randomized trial on inspiratory effort-targeted pressure support adjustment strategy in patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: protocol for the IT-PSV study.

Lu W, Miao M, Gao R, Yang Y, Zhang L, Weng L Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1483976.

PMID: 39582975 PMC: 11583156. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1483976.


Use of pressure muscle index to guide pressure support ventilation setting: a study protocol and statistical plan for a prospective randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial.

Gao R, Yang Y, Zhang L, Miao M, Zhou J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e082395.

PMID: 39097307 PMC: 11298740. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082395.


Use of pressure muscle index to predict the contribution of patient's inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation: a prospective physiological study.

Gao R, Zhou J, Yang Y, Xu S, Zhou Y, Zhang L Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1390878.

PMID: 38737762 PMC: 11082330. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1390878.


Effect and mechanical mechanism of spontaneous breathing on oxygenation and lung injury in mild or moderate animal ARDS.

Yang R, Zhou L, Chen Z, He S, Lian S, Shen Y BMC Pulm Med. 2023; 23(1):428.

PMID: 37925442 PMC: 10625710. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02730-y.


Nalmefene combined noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease coupled with type II respiratory failure: A meta-analysis.

He J, Luo W, Mei Y, Xu Y, Ding S Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(31):e34624.

PMID: 37543782 PMC: 10403022. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034624.


References
1.
Hudson M, Smuder A, Nelson W, Bruells C, Levine S, Powers S . Both high level pressure support ventilation and controlled mechanical ventilation induce diaphragm dysfunction and atrophy. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40(4):1254-60. PMC: 3308123. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823c8cc9. View

2.
Kyogoku M, Shimatani T, Hotz J, Newth C, Bellani G, Takeuchi M . Direction and Magnitude of Change in Plateau From Peak Pressure During Inspiratory Holds Can Identify the Degree of Spontaneous Effort and Elastic Workload in Ventilated Patients. Crit Care Med. 2020; 49(3):517-526. PMC: 8176786. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004746. View

3.
Telias I, Spadaro S . Techniques to monitor respiratory drive and inspiratory effort. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019; 26(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000680. View

4.
Pletsch-Assuncao R, Caleffi Pereira M, Ferreira J, Cardenas L, Albuquerque A, de Carvalho C . Accuracy of Invasive and Noninvasive Parameters for Diagnosing Ventilatory Overassistance During Pressure Support Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017; 46(3):411-417. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002871. View

5.
de Vries H, Jonkman A, Shi Z, Spoelstra-de Man A, Heunks L . Assessing breathing effort in mechanical ventilation: physiology and clinical implications. Ann Transl Med. 2018; 6(19):387. PMC: 6212364. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.53. View