» Articles » PMID: 36160459

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36160459
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The DESTINY-Breast03 clinical trial demonstrated that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) outperformed trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Considering the excessive cost of antibody-drug conjugates, the clinical value of T-DXd must be assessed by both its efficacy and cost. We compared the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for patients with HER2-positive mBC pretreated with anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane from the perspectives of the United States (US) and China. A comprehensive Markov model based on the DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial was used to compared the cost and effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for HER2-positive mBC. Data on direct medical cost and utilities were collected from published literatures. The recorded data included the costs, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to measure the potential uncertainty due to parameter variability. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Treatment of HER2-positive mBC with T-DXd gained 0.73 QALYs compared with T-DM1 strategy. The incremental cost was $59,942 in the US, with an ICER of $ 82,112/QALY and an INHB of 0.33 QALYs, respectively. In China, the incremental cost of T-DXd versus T-DM1 was $222,680, with an ICER of $305,041/QALY and a negative INHB of -5.18 QALYs. At willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY in the US and $37,653/QALY in China, the probability of T-DXd as the dominant option was 77.5 and 0.1%, respectively. The unit price of T-DXd greatly influenced the results according to one-way sensitivity analysis. To meet the 50% or 90% chance of being cost-effective, the estimated cost of T-DXd would need to be less than $17.24/mg and $12.06/mg in China, respectively. T-DXd is more cost-effective than T-DM1 for patients with HER2-positive mBC in the US, but not in China at current drug prices.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma in the Chinese healthcare system.

Lang W, He Y, Hou C, Li H, Jiang Q, Mei L Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15():1402423.

PMID: 39840092 PMC: 11746052. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1402423.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of Tumor Treating Fields treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Pei Z, Xiao N, Yang P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1276049.

PMID: 39502829 PMC: 11534589. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1276049.


TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-country cost-effectiveness analysis.

Zhu Y, Liu K, Zhu H Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241284998.

PMID: 39372041 PMC: 11450621. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241284998.


Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Cai H, Huang L, Zheng Z Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1421826.

PMID: 39135924 PMC: 11317436. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421826.


Optimal Sequential Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Evaluating Efficacy and Cross-Resistance.

Chen M, Huang R, Chen R, Pan F, Shen X, Li H Oncologist. 2024; 29(8):e957-e966.

PMID: 38574190 PMC: 11299950. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae055.


References
1.
Murray C, Evans D, Acharya A, Baltussen R . Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 2000; 9(3):235-51. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200004)9:3<235::aid-hec502>3.0.co;2-o. View

2.
Zhang B, Long E . Cost-effectiveness analysis of palbociclib or ribociclib in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 175(3):775-779. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05190-3. View

3.
Ogitani Y, Aida T, Hagihara K, Yamaguchi J, Ishii C, Harada N . DS-8201a, A Novel HER2-Targeting ADC with a Novel DNA Topoisomerase I Inhibitor, Demonstrates a Promising Antitumor Efficacy with Differentiation from T-DM1. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(20):5097-5108. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2822. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Chen J, Han M, Liu A, Shi B . Economic Evaluation of Sacituzumab Govitecan for the Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China and the US. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:734594. PMC: 8581633. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.734594. View