» Articles » PMID: 36160369

Toward Automatic Motivator Selection for Autism Behavior Intervention Therapy

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36160369
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) usually show little interest in academic activities and may display disruptive behavior when presented with assignments. Research indicates that incorporating motivational variables during interventions results in improvements in behavior and academic performance. However, the impact of such motivational variables varies between children. In this paper, we aim to address the problem of selecting the right motivator for children with ASD using reinforcement learning by adapting to the most influential factors impacting the effectiveness of the contingent motivator used. We model the task of selecting a motivator as a Markov decision process problem. The states, actions and rewards design consider the factors that impact the effectiveness of a motivator based on applied behavior analysis as well as learners' individual preferences. We use a Q-learning algorithm to solve the modeled problem. Our proposed solution is then implemented as a mobile application developed for special education plans coordination. To evaluate the motivator selection feature, we conduct a study involving a group of teachers and therapists and assess how the added feature aids the participants in their decision-making process of selecting a motivator. Preliminary results indicated that the motivator selection feature improved the usability of the mobile app. Analysis of the algorithm performance showed promising results and indicated improvement of the recommendations over time.

Citing Articles

A Survey on Autism Care, Diagnosis, and Intervention Based on Mobile Apps Focusing on Usability and Software Design.

Liu X, Zhao W, Qi Q, Luo X Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(14).

PMID: 37514555 PMC: 10384173. DOI: 10.3390/s23146260.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Liu S, See K, Ngiam K, Celi L, Sun X, Feng M . Reinforcement Learning for Clinical Decision Support in Critical Care: Comprehensive Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(7):e18477. PMC: 7400046. DOI: 10.2196/18477. View

3.
Stichter J, Randolph J, Kay D, Gage N . The use of structural analysis to develop antecedent-based interventions for students with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009; 39(6):883-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0693-8. View

4.
Linstead E, Burns R, Nguyen D, Tyler D . AMP: A platform for managing and mining data in the treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017; 2016:2545-2549. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591249. View

5.
Stratton S . Quasi-Experimental Design (Pre-Test and Post-Test Studies) in Prehospital and Disaster Research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019; 34(6):573-574. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X19005053. View