Measuring the Response to Visually Presented Faces in the Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Overview

Journal Cereb Cortex Commun

Publisher Oxford University Press

Date 2022 Sep 26

PMID 36159205

Authors

Lara Nikel

Magdalena W Sliwinska

Emel Kucuk

Leslie G Ungerleider

David Pitcher

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies identify multiple face-selective areas in the human brain. In the current study, we compared the functional response of the face area in the lateral prefrontal cortex to that of other face-selective areas. In Experiment 1, participants ( = 32) were scanned viewing videos containing faces, bodies, scenes, objects, and scrambled objects. We identified a face-selective area in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). In Experiment 2, participants ( = 24) viewed the same videos or static images. Results showed that the rIFG, right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS), and right occipital face area (rOFA) exhibited a greater response to moving than static faces. In Experiment 3, participants ( = 18) viewed face videos in the contralateral and ipsilateral visual fields. Results showed that the rIFG and rpSTS showed no visual field bias, while the rOFA and right fusiform face area (rFFA) showed a contralateral bias. These experiments suggest two conclusions; firstly, in all three experiments, the face area in the IFG was not as reliably identified as face areas in the occipitotemporal cortex. Secondly, the similarity of the response profiles in the IFG and pSTS suggests the areas may perform similar cognitive functions, a conclusion consistent with prior neuroanatomical and functional connectivity evidence.

Citing Articles

A double dissociation between semantic and spatial cognition in visual to default network pathways.

Gonzalez Alam T, Krieger-Redwood K, Varga D, Gao Z, Horner A, Hartley T Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39841127 PMC: 11753780. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94902.

Moving and Static Faces, Bodies, Objects, and Scenes Are Differentially Represented across the Three Visual Pathways.

Kucuk E, Foxwell M, Kaiser D, Pitcher D J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(12):2639-2651.

PMID: 38527070 PMC: 11602004. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02139.

TMS disruption of the lateral prefrontal cortex increases neural activity in the default mode network when naming facial expressions.

Pitcher D, Sliwinska M, Kaiser D Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 38048419 PMC: 10695328. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad072.

Hierarchical organization of social action features along the lateral visual pathway.

McMahon E, Bonner M, Isik L Curr Biol. 2023; 33(23):5035-5047.e8.

PMID: 37918399 PMC: 10841461. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.015.

References

Rapcsak S, Polster M, Glisky M, COMER J . False recognition of unfamiliar faces following right hemisphere damage: neuropsychological and anatomical observations. Cortex. 1996; 32(4):593-611. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(96)80033-5. View

Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller A, Lazeyras F, Mayer E . A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 11):2381-95. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg241. View

Gauthier I, Tarr M, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore J, Anderson A . The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(3):495-504. DOI: 10.1162/089892900562165. View

Rilling J, Glasser M, Preuss T, Ma X, Zhao T, Hu X . The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11(4):426-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn2072. View

Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Huber D . A distributed neural system for top-down face processing. Neurosci Lett. 2009; 451(1):6-10. PMC: 2634849. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.039. View

Grill-Spector K, Knouf N, Kanwisher N . The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(5):555-62. DOI: 10.1038/nn1224. View

Sliwinska M, Pitcher D . TMS demonstrates that both right and left superior temporal sulci are important for facial expression recognition. Neuroimage. 2018; 183:394-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.025. View

Eickhoff S, Stephan K, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink G, Amunts K . A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage. 2005; 25(4):1325-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034. View

Calder A, Young A . Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(8):641-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1724. View

10.

Pitcher D, Walsh V, Yovel G, Duchaine B . TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(18):1568-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.063. View

11.

Phillips M, Young A, Scott S, Calder A, Andrew C, Giampietro V . Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust. Proc Biol Sci. 1998; 265(1408):1809-17. PMC: 1689379. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0506. View

12.

Sliwinska M, Searle L, Earl M, OGorman D, Pollicina G, Burton A . Face learning via brief real-world social interactions induces changes in face-selective brain areas and hippocampus. Perception. 2022; 51(8):521-538. PMC: 9396469. DOI: 10.1177/03010066221098728. View

13.

Finzi D, Gomez J, Nordt M, Rezai A, Poltoratski S, Grill-Spector K . Differential spatial computations in ventral and lateral face-selective regions are scaffolded by structural connections. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2278. PMC: 8050273. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22524-2. View

14.

Tsao D, Moeller S, Freiwald W . Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(49):19514-9. PMC: 2614792. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809662105. View

15.

Kalbe E, Schlegel M, Sack A, Nowak D, Dafotakis M, Bangard C . Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: a TMS study. Cortex. 2009; 46(6):769-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010. View

16.

Chan A, Downing P . Faces and eyes in human lateral prefrontal cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:51. PMC: 3108382. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00051. View

17.

Sliwinska M, Bearpark C, Corkhill J, McPhillips A, Pitcher D . Dissociable pathways for moving and static face perception begin in early visual cortex: Evidence from an acquired prosopagnosic. Cortex. 2020; 130:327-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.033. View

18.

Gobbini M, Leibenluft E, Santiago N, Haxby J . Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(4):1628-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.049. View

19.

Davies-Thompson J, Andrews T . Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 108(11):3087-95. PMC: 3544867. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01171.2011. View

20.

Baldauf D, Desimone R . Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science. 2014; 344(6182):424-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1247003. View