» Articles » PMID: 36159051

The Effect of Multiple Enamel Conditioning on Enamel Micro-hardness

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Sep 26
PMID 36159051
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: White spot formation is one of the common side effects in orthodontic treatments and multiple enamel conditioning might happen even during on session of fixed orthodontic treatments. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of multiple enamel conditioning with different methods on enamel micro-hardness (MH).

Materials And Methods: In this experimental study, the buccal surfaces of 105 extracted premolars were evaluated in seven groups: One control and six experimental groups. The enamel conditioning was performed in three ways: Etching with phosphoric acid 37%, etching with phosphoric acid 37% followed by primer application and conditioning with self-etch primer. The conditioning process in each way was also performed twice consecutively. The specimens were submitted in pH cycling model with demineralization and re-mineralization solutions for 14 days. Afterward Vickers MH test was applied with 0.981N force on the teeth for 10 s indentation time. Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (honestly significant difference) test for multiple comparisons. A value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: MH analysis showed statistically significant differences between the control group and the other conditioned groups ( < 0.05). The groups conditioned with acid-etch and primer, particularly twice, showed the lowest amount of MH in comparison to other groups. Self-etch primer had the least effect on MH of the enamel. Single time etching without using primer, made no considerable difference when compared to multiple etching.

Conclusion: Etching process and covering the enamel with primer decrease enamel MH. Using self-etch primer is a more conservative method of enamel conditioning.

Citing Articles

Assessment of enamel surface roughness and hardness with metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets using different etching and adhesive systems: An study.

Zawawi R, Almosa N Saudi Dent J. 2023; 35(6):641-650.

PMID: 37817787 PMC: 10562107. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.015.

References
1.
Montasser M, El-Wassefy N, Taha M . In vitro study of the potential protection of sound enamel against demineralization. Prog Orthod. 2015; 16:12. PMC: 4440871. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-015-0080-2. View

2.
Vicente A, Bravo L, Romero M . Influence of a nonrinse conditioner on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin adhesive system. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(3):400-5. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[400:IOANCO]2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Argenta R, Tabchoury C, Cury J . A modified pH-cycling model to evaluate fluoride effect on enamel demineralization. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2004; 17(3):241-6. DOI: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000300008. View

4.
Kuhar M, Cevc P, Schara M, Funduk N . Enhanced permeability of acid-etched or ground dental enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77(6):578-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70098-2. View

5.
Kohda N, Iijima M, Brantley W, Muguruma T, Yuasa T, Nakagaki S . Effects of bonding materials on the mechanical properties of enamel around orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2011; 82(2):187-95. PMC: 8867942. DOI: 10.2319/020411-78.1. View