The Importance of Internal and External Features in Recognizing Faces That Vary in Familiarity and Race

Overview

Journal Perception

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 2022 Sep 26

PMID 36154747

Authors

Menahal Latif

Margaret C Moulson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Familiar and unfamiliar faces are recognized in fundamentally different ways. One way in which recognition differs is in terms of the features that facilitate recognition: previous studies have shown that familiar face recognition depends more on internal facial features (i.e., eyes, nose and mouth), whereas unfamiliar face recognition depends more on external facial features (i.e., hair, ears and contour). However, very few studies have examined the recognition of faces that vary in both familiarity and race, and the reliance on different facial features, whilst also using faces that incorporate natural within-person variability. In the current study, we used an online version of the card sorting task to assess adults' ( = 258) recognition of faces that varied in familiarity and race when presented with either the whole face, internal features only, or external features only. Adults better recognized familiar faces than unfamiliar faces in both the whole face and the internal features only conditions, but not in the external features only condition. Reasons why adults did not show an own-race advantage in recognition are discussed.

References

Grill-Spector K, Weiner K, Kay K, Gomez J . The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017; 3:167-196. PMC: 6345578. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061214. View

Megreya A, Bindemann M . Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect. Perception. 2010; 38(12):1831-48. DOI: 10.1068/p6385. View

Kramer R, Manesi Z, Towler A, Reynolds M, Burton A . Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features. Perception. 2017; 47(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1177/0301006617725242. View

Laurence S, Zhou X, Mondloch C . The flip side of the other-race coin: They all look different to me. Br J Psychol. 2015; 107(2):374-88. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12147. View

Visconti di Oleggio Castello M, Wheeler K, Cipolli C, Gobbini M . Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178895. PMC: 5459439. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895. View

Johnston R, Edmonds A . Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory. 2009; 17(5):577-96. DOI: 10.1080/09658210902976969. View

Suhrke J, Freitag C, Lamm B, Teiser J, Poloczek S, Fassbender I . Experience with headwear influences the other-race effect in 4-year-old children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015; 137:156-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.011. View

Davies G, Shepherd J, Ellis H . Similarity effects in face recognition. Am J Psychol. 1979; 92(3):507-23. View

Bonner L, Burton M . 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004; 57(6):1019-29. DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000657. View

10.

McKone E, Dawel A, Robbins R, Shou Y, Chen N, Crookes K . Why the other-race effect matters: Poor recognition of other-race faces impacts everyday social interactions. Br J Psychol. 2021; 114 Suppl 1:230-252. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12508. View

11.

Sangrigoli S, Pallier C, Argenti A, Ventureyra V, de Schonen S . Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol Sci. 2005; 16(6):440-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x. View

12.

Andrews S, Jenkins R, Cursiter H, Burton A . Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 68(10):2041-50. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1003949. View

13.

Ellis H, Shepherd J, Davies G . Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception. 1979; 8(4):431-9. DOI: 10.1068/p080431. View

14.

Zhou X, Mondloch C . Recognizing "Bella Swan" and "Hermione Granger": No Own-Race Advantage in Recognizing Photos of Famous Faces. Perception. 2016; 45(12):1426-1429. DOI: 10.1177/0301006616662046. View

15.

McKone E, Wan L, Pidcock M, Crookes K, Reynolds K, Dawel A . A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):12820. PMC: 6731249. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49202-0. View

16.

de Heering A, de Liedekerke C, Deboni M, Rossion B . The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effect. Dev Sci. 2010; 13(1):181-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00876.x. View

17.

Wong H, Stephen I, Keeble D . The Own-Race Bias for Face Recognition in a Multiracial Society. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:208. PMC: 7067904. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00208. View

18.

Havard C . The Importance of Internal and External Features in Matching Own and Other Race Faces. Perception. 2021; 50(10):861-875. DOI: 10.1177/03010066211043464. View

19.

Tanaka J, Sengco J . Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cognit. 1997; 25(5):583-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211301. View

20.

Hancock , Bruce V , Burton . Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(9):330-337. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01519-9. View