» Articles » PMID: 36153386

Active Bone Marrow S-values for the Low-energy Electron Emitter Terbium-161 Compared to S-values for Lutetium-177 and Yttrium-90

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Phys
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Sep 24
PMID 36153386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Based on theoretical and preclinical results, terbium-161 may be a valid alternative to lutetium-177 and yttrium-90 in radionuclide therapies. The large low-energy electron emission from terbium-161 is a favorable feature in the treatment of disseminated disease, but its impact on the radiosensitive bone marrow needs to be evaluated. Using voxel-based skeletal dosimetry models in which active bone marrow is defined as regions containing stem cells and progenitor cells of the hematopoietic lineage, we generated S-values (absorbed dose per decay) for terbium-161 and evaluated its distribution-dependence in bone marrow cavities.

Methods: S-values in the active bone marrow were calculated for terbium-161, lutetium-177, and yttrium-90 irradiation using two (male/female) image-based bone marrow dosimetry models. The radionuclides were distributed to one of the three structures that define the spongiosa bone region in the skeletal models: (i) active bone marrow, (ii) inactive bone marrow, or (iii) surface or whole volume of the trabecular bone. Decay data from ICRP 107 were combined with specific absorbed fractions to calculate S-values for 13 skeletal sites. To increase the utility, the skeletal site-specific S-values were averaged to produce whole-body average S-values and spongiosa average S-values.

Results: For yttrium-90, the high-energy β particles irradiate the active marrow regardless of the source compartment, consistently generating the highest S-values (65-90% higher). Between terbium-161 and lutetium-177, the largest differences in S-values were with an active marrow source (50%), such as self-irradiation, due to the contribution of the short-ranged conversion and Auger electrons from terbium-161. Their influence decreased as the source moved to inactive marrow or the surface or volume of the trabecular bone, reducing the S-values and the differences between terbium-161 and lutetium-177 (15-35%).

Conclusion: The S-values of terbium-161 for active bone marrow and, consequently, the bone marrow toxicity profile were more dependent on the radionuclide distribution within the bone marrow cavity than the S-values of lutetium-177 and yttrium-90. This effect was attributed to the considerable low-energy electron emission of terbium-161. Therefore, it will be critical to investigate the bone marrow distribution of a particular radiopharmaceutical for accurate estimation of the active bone marrow dose.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the tolerability of Tb- and Lu-labeled somatostatin analogues in the preclinical setting.

Busslinger S, Mapanao A, Kegler K, Bernhardt P, Fluhmann F, Fricke J Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):4049-4061.

PMID: 39046521 PMC: 11527941. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06827-2.


Improvements of Lu SPECT images from sparsely acquired projections by reconstruction with deep-learning-generated synthetic projections.

Wikberg E, Van Essen M, Ryden T, Svensson J, Gjertsson P, Bernhardt P EJNMMI Phys. 2024; 11(1):53.

PMID: 38941040 PMC: 11213840. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00655-x.


Opportunities and potential challenges of using terbium-161 for targeted radionuclide therapy in clinics.

Muller C, van der Meulen N, Schibli R Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(11):3181-3184.

PMID: 37436459 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06316-y.


Specific Uptake in the Bone Marrow Causes High Absorbed Red Marrow Doses During [Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment.

Hemmingsson J, Svensson J, Hallqvist A, Smits K, Johanson V, Bernhardt P J Nucl Med. 2023; 64(9):1456-1462.

PMID: 37290797 PMC: 10478826. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265484.

References
1.
Muller C, Umbricht C, Gracheva N, Tschan V, Pellegrini G, Bernhardt P . Terbium-161 for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46(9):1919-1930. PMC: 6820371. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04345-0. View

2.
Geyer A, Schwarz B, Hobbs R, Sgouros G, Bolch W . Quantitative impact of changes in marrow cellularity, skeletal size, and bone mineral density on active marrow dosimetry based upon a reference model. Med Phys. 2017; 44(1):272-283. PMC: 6385860. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12002. View

3.
Bourke V, Watchman C, Reith J, Jorgensen M, Dieudonne A, Bolch W . Spatial gradients of blood vessels and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells within the marrow cavities of the human skeleton. Blood. 2009; 114(19):4077-80. PMC: 2774549. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192922. View

4.
OReilly S, DeWeese L, Maynard M, Rajon D, Wayson M, Marshall E . An image-based skeletal dosimetry model for the ICRP reference adult female-internal electron sources. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61(24):8794-8824. PMC: 6385869. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8794. View

5.
Bodei L, Kidd M, Paganelli G, Grana C, Drozdov I, Cremonesi M . Long-term tolerability of PRRT in 807 patients with neuroendocrine tumours: the value and limitations of clinical factors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 42(1):5-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2893-5. View