» Articles » PMID: 36150166

Do Thresholds for Invasive Ventilation in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Exist? A Cohort Study

Abstract

Invasive ventilation is a significant event for patients with respiratory failure. Physiologic thresholds standardize the use of invasive ventilation in clinical trials, but it is unknown whether thresholds prompt invasive ventilation in clinical practice. To measure, in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, the probability of invasive ventilation within 3 hours after meeting physiologic thresholds. We studied patients admitted to intensive care receiving Fi of 0.4 or more via nonrebreather mask, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (2008-2019) and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers Database (AmsterdamUMCdb) (2003-2016). We evaluated 17 thresholds, including the ratio of arterial to inspired oxygen, the ratio of saturation to inspired oxygen ratio, composite scores, and criteria from randomized trials. We report the probability of invasive ventilation within 3 hours of meeting each threshold and its association with covariates using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). We studied 4,726 patients (3,365 from MIMIC, 1,361 from AmsterdamUMCdb). Invasive ventilation occurred in 28% (1,320). In MIMIC, the highest probability of invasive ventilation within 3 hours of meeting a threshold was 20%, after meeting prespecified neurologic or respiratory criteria while on vasopressors, and 19%, after a ratio of arterial to inspired oxygen of <80 mm Hg. In AmsterdamUMCdb, the highest probability was 34%, after vasopressor initiation, and 25%, after a ratio of saturation to inspired oxygen of <90. The probability after meeting the threshold from randomized trials was 9% (MIMIC) and 13% (AmsterdamUMCdb). In MIMIC, a race/ethnicity of Black (OR, 0.75; 95% CrI, 0.57-0.96) or Asian (OR, 0.6; 95% CrI, 0.35-0.95) compared with White was associated with decreased probability of invasive ventilation after meeting a threshold. The probability of invasive ventilation within 3 hours of meeting physiologic thresholds was low and associated with patient race/ethnicity.

Citing Articles

Machine learning models compared with current clinical indices to predict the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Yu H, Saffaran S, Tonelli R, Laffey J, Esquinas A, de Lima L Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):101.

PMID: 40055757 PMC: 11887196. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05336-4.


A video-based approach to decipher intubation decisions for the critically ill.

Dumas G, Lavillegrand J, Azoulay E Intensive Care Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39774859 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07765-1.


Noninvasive vs invasive respiratory support for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Mosier J, Subbian V, Pungitore S, Prabhudesai D, Essay P, Bedrick E PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0307849.

PMID: 39240793 PMC: 11379309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307849.


Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19.

Yang P, Gregory I, Robichaux C, Holder A, Martin G, Esper A Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(3):e1059.

PMID: 38975567 PMC: 11224893. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001059.


Basing intubation of acutely hypoxemic patients on physiologic principles.

Laghi F, Shaikh H, Caccani N Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):86.

PMID: 38864960 PMC: 11169311. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01327-w.