Examination of a Foot Mounted IMU-based Methodology for a Running Gait Assessment
Overview
Affiliations
Gait assessment is essential to understand injury prevention mechanisms during running, where high-impact forces can lead to a range of injuries in the lower extremities. Information regarding the running style to increase efficiency and/or selection of the correct running equipment, such as shoe type, can minimize the risk of injury, e.g., matching a runner's gait to a particular set of cushioning technologies found in modern shoes (neutral/support cushioning). Awareness of training or selection of the correct equipment requires an understanding of a runner's biomechanics, such as determining foot orientation when it strikes the ground. Previous work involved a low-cost approach with a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an associated zero-crossing-based methodology to objectively understand a runner's biomechanics (in any setting) to learn about shoe selection. Here, an investigation of the previously presented ZC-based methodology is presented only to determine general validity for running gait assessment in a range of running abilities from novice (8 km/h) to experienced (16 km/h+). In comparison to Vicon 3D motion tracking data, the presented approach can extract pronation, foot strike location, and ground contact time with good [ICC > 0.750] to excellent [ICC > 0.900] agreement between 8-12 km/h runs. However, at higher speeds (14 km/h+), the ZC-based approach begins to deteriorate in performance, suggesting that other features and approaches may be more suitable for faster running and sprinting tasks.
Onodera K, Miyamoto N, Hirose K, Kondo A, Kajiwara W, Nakano H Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).
PMID: 40006301 PMC: 11859285. DOI: 10.3390/s25041073.
Instrumenting Parkrun: Usefulness and Validity of Inertial Sensors.
Mason R, Celik Y, Barry G, Godfrey A, Stuart S Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.
PMID: 39796819 PMC: 11723058. DOI: 10.3390/s25010030.
Validity and reliability of running gait measurement with the ViMove2 system.
Mason R, Barry G, Hall G, Godfrey A, Stuart S PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312952.
PMID: 39480797 PMC: 11527157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312952.
Pareja-Cano A, Arjona J, Caulfield B, Cuesta-Vargas A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(7).
PMID: 38610402 PMC: 11014260. DOI: 10.3390/s24072191.
Wearables for running gait analysis: A study protocol.
Mason R, Godfrey A, Barry G, Stuart S PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291289.
PMID: 37695752 PMC: 10495009. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291289.