» Articles » PMID: 36147123

The Induced Membrane Technique: A Therapeutic Option for Managing Bone Defects in the Upper Extremity: Case Series for 7 Patients

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36147123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The reconstruction of bone defects of tumoral, infectious or traumatic origin of the limbs remains a major therapeutic challenge for the orthopedic surgeon and the patient, in terms of anatomical and functional results.

Cases Presentation: We report the case of 7 patients who underwent induced membrane bone reconstruction of the upper extremity, 5 patients with initial injury to the forearm, and 2 of our patients, to the humerus. In terms of function, the range of prono-supination was 125°, the range of wrist flexion-extension was 165°, and the range of elbow mobility was 170°. All patients achieved union at the time of the last follow-up. Two patients achieved union at 6 months, one patient at 5 months, one patient at 4 months, and three patients at 3 months.

Discussion: The induced membrane (IM) technique has been used for more than 30 years, and it's more and more widely accepted all over the world, as a simple and effective technique for reconstruction of segmental bone defects. The technique comprises 2 surgical stages, The first step involves the total excision of infected and non-viable lesions both bone and soft tissue until tissue with optimal vascularization "Paprika sign", then the strict instrumental stabilization of the skeleton and the realization of a covering flap if necessary, depending on the site of the initial injury initial lesion and the extent of the resection.

Conclusion: The technique of induced membrane has proven its effectiveness in the management of bone loss.

Citing Articles

Masquelet's induced membrane technique in the upper limb: a systematic review of the current outcomes.

Pederiva D, De Luca L, Faldini C, Vergano L J Orthop Traumatol. 2025; 26(1):4.

PMID: 39869276 PMC: 11772631. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00815-w.


Biological Scaffolds Assembled with Magnetic Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.

Li Z, Xue L, Wang P, Ren X, Zhang Y, Wang C Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(4).

PMID: 36837058 PMC: 9961196. DOI: 10.3390/ma16041429.

References
1.
Zappaterra T, Ghislandi X, Adam A, Huard S, Gindraux F, Gallinet D . [Induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of bone defects in upper limb. A prospective single center study of nine cases]. Chir Main. 2011; 30(4):255-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2011.06.005. View

2.
Walker M, Sharareh B, Mitchell S . Masquelet Reconstruction for Posttraumatic Segmental Bone Defects in the Forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 44(4):342.e1-342.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.003. View

3.
Regan D, Crespo A, Konda S, Egol K . Functional Outcomes of Compression Plating and Bone Grafting for Operative Treatment of Nonunions About the Forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 43(6):564.e1-564.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.039. View

4.
Masquelet A . Induced Membrane Technique: Pearls and Pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31 Suppl 5:S36-S38. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000979. View

5.
Ring D, Allende C, Jafarnia K, Allende B, Jupiter J . Ununited diaphyseal forearm fractures with segmental defects: plate fixation and autogenous cancellous bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(11):2440-5. View