» Articles » PMID: 36142132

Single-Step Genome Editing of Small Ruminant Embryos by Electroporation

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36142132
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the possibility of single-step genome editing in small ruminants by CRISPR-Cas9 zygote electroporation. We targeted SOCS2 and PDX1 in sheep embryos and OTX2 in goat embryos, utilizing a dual sgRNA approach. Gene editing efficiency was compared between microinjection and three different electroporation settings performed at four different times of embryo development. Electroporation of sheep zygotes 6 h after fertilization with settings that included short high-voltage (poring) and long low-voltage (transfer) pulses was efficient at producing SOCS2 knock-out blastocysts. The mutation rate after CRISPR/Cas9 electroporation was 95.6% ± 8%, including 95.4% ± 9% biallelic mutations; which compared favorably to 82.3% ± 8% and 25% ± 10%, respectively, when using microinjection. We also successfully disrupted the PDX1 gene in sheep and the OTX2 gene in goat embryos. The biallelic mutation rate was 81 ± 5% for PDX1 and 85% ± 6% for OTX2. In conclusion, using single-step CRISPR-Cas9 zygote electroporation, we successfully introduced biallelic deletions in the genome of small ruminant embryos.

Citing Articles

Electroporation Delivery of Cas9 sgRNA Ribonucleoprotein-Mediated Genome Editing in Sheep IVF Zygotes.

Pi W, Feng G, Liu M, Nie C, Chen C, Wang J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273092 PMC: 11395511. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179145.


Livestock embryonic stem cells for reproductive biotechniques and genetic improvement.

Navarro M, Laiz-Quiroga L, Bluguermann C, Mutto A Anim Reprod. 2024; 21(3):e20240029.

PMID: 39175999 PMC: 11340801. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0029.

References
1.
Wu M, Yuan F . Membrane binding of plasmid DNA and endocytic pathways are involved in electrotransfection of mammalian cells. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e20923. PMC: 3113837. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020923. View

2.
Bogliotti Y, Vilarino M, Ross P . Laser-assisted Cytoplasmic Microinjection in Livestock Zygotes. J Vis Exp. 2016; (116). PMC: 5092170. DOI: 10.3791/54465. View

3.
Czernik M, Anzalone D, Palazzese L, Oikawa M, Loi P . Somatic cell nuclear transfer: failures, successes and the challenges ahead. Int J Dev Biol. 2019; 63(3-4-5):123-130. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.180324mc. View

4.
Cemazar M, Golzio M, Sersa G, Hojman P, Kranjc S, Mesojednik S . Control by pulse parameters of DNA electrotransfer into solid tumors in mice. Gene Ther. 2009; 16(5):635-44. DOI: 10.1038/gt.2009.10. View

5.
Haberl S, Kanduser M, Flisar K, Hodzic D, Bregar V, Miklavcic D . Effect of different parameters used for in vitro gene electrotransfer on gene expression efficiency, cell viability and visualization of plasmid DNA at the membrane level. J Gene Med. 2013; 15(5):169-81. DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2706. View