» Articles » PMID: 36139617

Lymph Node Ratio As a Prognostic Factor in Neck Dissection in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36139617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many studies have evaluated the clinical implications of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to address LNR as a prognosticator in patients with OSCC. A systematic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and studies between 2009 and 2020 were sought. The pooled relative risk was calculated along with 95% confidence intervals for the following endpoints: overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional disease-free survival (LRDFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to the random-effects model (Der Simonian-Laird approach). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed as well. Finally, 32 cohort studies were eligible, which included 20,994 patients with OSCC. Patients were subdivided into two categories, group YES (studies that included in their analysis only patients with positive lymph nodes) and group NO (studies that did not exclude LNR = 0 patients). In the group YES, patients with high LNR had shorter OS (RR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.91), DFS (RR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.42-1.99), DSS (RR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.56-2.42), DMFS (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.13-2.96), LRDFS (RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.10-2.20), and LRFS (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.41-2.13) compared to patients with low LNR. In the group NO, patients with high LNR in comparison had shorter OS (RR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.99-2.85), DFS (RR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.48-2.81), and DSS (RR = 2.90, 95% CI: 2.35-3.57) compared to patients with low LNR. Based on those findings, LNR might be an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with OSCC and could be incorporated into future classification systems for better risk stratification.

Citing Articles

Surgical Puzzle: Concurrent Comprehensive Neck Dissection Strategies Unravelling the Mystery of Carcinoma Unknown Primary when Performed with TORS Radical Tonsillectomy and Mucosal Tongue Base Wedge Biopsy in Northern Indian Cohort.

Panda N, Chettuvatti K, Bakshi J Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(6):5201-5208.

PMID: 39559050 PMC: 11569348. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04945-9.


The prognostic values of lymph node ratio for gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen M, Wang Y, Chen Y, Han L, Zheng A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1475348.

PMID: 39411125 PMC: 11473349. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1475348.


Association of Lymph Nodes Positive Rate With the Risk of Recurrence in Patients With Stage T1 Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Qin C, Cai S, Yin M, Ma B, Shen C, Zhang Y J Endocr Soc. 2024; 8(8):bvae131.

PMID: 39015141 PMC: 11250184. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae131.


Head and Neck Cancer Patients' Survival According to HPV Status, miRNA Profiling, and Tumour Features-A Cohort Study.

Simic I, Bozinovic K, Milutin Gasperov N, Kordic M, Pesut E, Manojlovic L Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36834756 PMC: 9959828. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043344.


Lymph Node Ratio in Head and Neck Cancer with Submental Flap Reconstruction.

Suzuki H, Beppu S, Nishikawa D, Terada H, Sawabe M, Hanai N Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36428496 PMC: 9687667. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112923.

References
1.
Lee C, Ho H, Su Y, Lee M, Hung S, Chen Y . The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(27):e1069. PMC: 4504633. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001069. View

2.
Suzuki H, Beppu S, Hanai N, Hirakawa H, Hasegawa Y . Lymph node density predicts lung metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 54(2):213-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.11.002. View

3.
Loganathan P, Sayan A, Hsu D, Paraneetharan S, Ilankovan V . Squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior tongue: is tumour thickness an indicator for cervical metastasis?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 46(4):407-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.11.003. View

4.
Liu D, Chen Y, Deng M, Xie G, Wang J, Zhang L . Lymph node ratio and breast cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2013; 21(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-013-0497-8. View

5.
Weckx A, Riekert M, Grandoch A, Schick V, Zoller J, Kreppel M . Time to recurrence and patient survival in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2019; 94:8-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.002. View