» Articles » PMID: 36139281

Reporting of Freshwater Cyanobacterial Poisoning in Terrestrial Wildlife: A Systematic Map

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36139281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Global warming and over-enrichment of freshwater systems have led to an increase in harmful cyanobacterial blooms (cyanoHABs), affecting human and animal health. The aim of this systematic map was to detail the current literature surrounding cyanotoxin poisonings in terrestrial wildlife and identify possible improvements to reports of morbidity and mortality from cyanotoxins. A systematic search was conducted using the electronic databases Scopus and Web of Science, yielding 5059 published studies identifying 45 separate case reports of wildlife poisonings from North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. Currently, no gold standard for the diagnosis of cyanotoxin intoxication exists for wildlife, and we present suggested guidelines here. These involved immunoassays and analytical chemistry techniques to identify the toxin involved, PCR to identify the cyanobacterial species involved, and evidence of ingestion or exposure to cyanotoxins in the animals affected. Of the 45 cases, our recommended methods concurred with 48.9% of cases. Most often, cases were investigated after a mortality event had already occurred, and where mitigation was implemented, only three cases were successful in their efforts. Notably, only one case of invasive cyanobacteria was recorded in this review despite invasive species being known to occur throughout the globe; this could explain the underreporting of invasive cyanobacteria. This systematic map highlights the perceived absence of robust detection, surveillance, and diagnosis of cyanotoxin poisoning in wildlife. It may be true that wildlife is less susceptible to these poisoning events; however, the true rates of poisoning are likely much more than is reported in the literature.

Citing Articles

Invited Perspective: Decentralized CyanoHAB Monitoring Is Needed to Understand Public Health Risks.

Moore C Environ Health Perspect. 2023; 131(6):61306.

PMID: 37342991 PMC: 10284345. DOI: 10.1289/EHP12948.


Wildlife Disease Monitoring: Methods and Perspectives.

Mazzamuto M, Schilling A, Romeo C Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(21).

PMID: 36359156 PMC: 9659093. DOI: 10.3390/ani12213032.

References
1.
Cox P, Banack S, Murch S . Biomagnification of cyanobacterial neurotoxins and neurodegenerative disease among the Chamorro people of Guam. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(23):13380-3. PMC: 263822. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235808100. View

2.
Foss A, Aubel M, Gallagher B, Mettee N, Miller A, Fogelson S . Diagnosing Microcystin Intoxication of Canines: Clinicopathological Indications, Pathological Characteristics, and Analytical Detection in Postmortem and Antemortem Samples. Toxins (Basel). 2019; 11(8). PMC: 6722975. DOI: 10.3390/toxins11080456. View

3.
Haffner G, Drouillard K, Albert A, Dixon B . Immunosuppression in the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) induced by pesticide exposure. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002; 22(1):101-10. View

4.
Clark J, Schaeffer B, Darling J, Urquhart E, Johnston J, Ignatius A . Satellite monitoring of cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom frequency in recreational waters and drinking source waters. Ecol Indic. 2018; 80:84-95. PMC: 6145495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.046. View

5.
Gkelis S, Lanaras T, Sivonen K . The presence of microcystins and other cyanobacterial bioactive peptides in aquatic fauna collected from Greek freshwaters. Aquat Toxicol. 2006; 78(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.02.001. View