» Articles » PMID: 36138700

Clinical Accuracy of Non-Contact Forehead Infrared Thermometer Measurement in Children: An Observational Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36138700
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated the clinical reliability and utility of temperature measurements using no-contact forehead infrared thermometers (NCFITs) by comparing their temperature measurements with those obtained using infrared tympanic thermometers (IRTTs) in children. In this observational, prospective, and cross-sectional study, we enrolled 255 children (aged 1 month to 18 years) from the pediatric surgery ward at a tertiary medical center in Korea. The mean age of the children was 9.05 ± 5.39 years, and 54.9% were boys. The incidence rate of fever, defined as an IRTT reading of ≥38.0 °C, was 15.7%. The ICC coefficient for the assessment of agreement between temperatures recorded by the NCFIT and IRTT was 0.87, and the κ-coefficient was 0.83. The bias and 95% limits of agreement were 0.15 °C (−0.43 to 0.73). For an accurate diagnosis of fever (≥38 °C), the false-negative rate was much lower, but the false-positive rate was higher, especially in 6-year-old children. Therefore, NCFITs can be used to screen children for fever. However, a secondary check is required using another thermometer when the child’s temperature is >38 °C. NCFITs are proposed for screening but not for measuring the temperature. For the latter, an accurate and reliable thermometer shall be used.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Methods of Body Temperature Measurement in Children: A Latent Class Approach.

Swapna K, George B, Pillai R, Rajasekharan Nair J Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77325.

PMID: 39935916 PMC: 11812845. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77325.


The impact of age on comparative diagnostic accuracy of temporal artery thermometers and non-contact infrared thermometers for fever detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee K, Lin Y, Tzeng Y, Liao W, Lo C, Chen P BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39762771 PMC: 11702092. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-10332-0.


Comparative Evaluation of Calibrated and Non-calibrated Infrared Thermometer Versus Calibrated Digital Thermometer in Healthy Volunteers and Febrile Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Central India.

Kaore S, Najmi A, Balakrishnan S, Khan M, Kumar P, Gupta A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):S1991-S1994.

PMID: 39346411 PMC: 11426774. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_73_24.


Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers and Thermal Scanners for Human Body Temperature Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Zhao Y, Bergmann J Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(17).

PMID: 37687902 PMC: 10490756. DOI: 10.3390/s23177439.

References
1.
Paes B, Vermeulen K, Brohet R, van der Ploeg T, de Winter J . Accuracy of tympanic and infrared skin thermometers in children. Arch Dis Child. 2010; 95(12):974-8. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.185801. View

2.
Wang K, Gill P, Wolstenholme J, Price C, Heneghan C, Thompson M . Non-contact infrared thermometers for measuring temperature in children: primary care diagnostic technology update. Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64(627):e681-3. PMC: 4173735. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X682045. View

3.
Chen H, Chen A, Chen C . Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(10). PMC: 7284737. DOI: 10.3390/s20102885. View

4.
Moran J, Peter J, Solomon P, Grealy B, Smith T, Ashforth W . Tympanic temperature measurements: are they reliable in the critically ill? A clinical study of measures of agreement. Crit Care Med. 2006; 35(1):155-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000250318.31453.CB. View

5.
Van den Bruel A, Verbakel J, Wang K, Fleming S, Holtman G, Glogowska M . Non-contact infrared thermometers compared with current approaches in primary care for children aged 5 years and under: a method comparison study. Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(53):1-28. PMC: 7681337. DOI: 10.3310/hta24530. View