» Articles » PMID: 36138248

Utilization of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair at a Large Hernia Center in China: a Single-center Observational Study

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Sep 22
PMID 36138248
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The utilization of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in China remains unclear. We aim to investigate the rates of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs and its associated factors at a large hernia center.

Methods: Data were obtained from the front sheet of medical records of Beijing Chaoyang hospital. Adult inguinal hernia inpatients who underwent hernia repairs between 2013 and 2020 were included. We calculated the overall rates of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs and compared the rate of laparoscopic repairs between different sex, age groups, types, and sides of inguinal hernias. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the rate of laparoscopic repairs.

Results: 14,481 inpatients with inguinal hernia were included. 91.78% were male, 75.43% were more than 50 years, 75.20% were unilateral inguinal hernia, and 64.57% were indirect inguinal hernia. Overall, 49.47% underwent laparoscopic repairs and 50.53% underwent open repairs. Women had lower rate of laparoscopic repair than men, especially in those with unilateral hernias. Bilateral and direct inguinal hernia had higher rates of laparoscopic repair than unilateral and indirect inguinal hernia. Multivariable logistic regression showed that inpatients who were women, > 70 years, pantaloon inguinal hernia, with obstruction, and more comorbidities were less likely to have laparoscopic repairs.

Conclusion: Around 50% of inguinal hernia patients at a large hernia center underwent laparoscopic repairs, which was more commonly performed in male, young, bilateral inguinal hernia, and inpatients without comorbidities. More efforts were needed to increase the safe and effective laparoscopic utilization among female patients with inguinal hernias.

References
1.
Beard J, Ohene-Yeboah M, Tabiri S, Amoako J, Abantanga F, Sims C . Outcomes After Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh Performed by Medical Doctors and Surgeons in Ghana. JAMA Surg. 2019; 154(9):853-859. PMC: 6596328. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1744. View

2.
Ramsay G, Scott N, Jansen J . A 19 year population-based cohort study analysing reoperation for recurrence following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs. Hernia. 2019; 24(4):793-800. PMC: 7395908. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02073-w. View

3.
Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K . Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003; 362(9395):1561-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0. View

4.
Kevric J, Papa N, Toshniwal S, Perera M . Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in Australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons. ANZ J Surg. 2017; 88(4):E298-E302. DOI: 10.1111/ans.13899. View

5.
Susmallian S, Barnea R, Ponomarenko O . Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair and Open Prolene Hernia System for Inguinal Hernia Repair Have Similar Outcomes: A Retrospective Study. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021; 116(3):271-283. DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.3.271. View