» Articles » PMID: 36137211

Comparative Studies of Genomic and Epigenetic Factors Influencing Transcriptional Variation in Two Insect Species

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2022 Sep 22
PMID 36137211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different genes show different levels of expression variability. For example, highly expressed genes tend to exhibit less expression variability. Genes whose promoters have TATA box and initiator motifs tend to have increased expression variability. On the other hand, DNA methylation of transcriptional units, or gene body DNA methylation, is associated with reduced gene expression variability in many species. Interestingly, some insect lineages, most notably Diptera including the canonical model insect Drosophila melanogaster, have lost DNA methylation. Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether genomic features similarly influence gene expression variability in lineages with and without DNA methylation. We analyzed recently generated large-scale data sets in D. melanogaster and honey bee (Apis mellifera) to investigate these questions. Our analysis shows that increased gene expression levels are consistently associated with reduced expression variability in both species, while the presence of TATA box is consistently associated with increased gene expression variability. In contrast, initiator motifs and gene lengths have weak effects limited to some data sets. Importantly, we show that a sequence characteristics indicative of gene body DNA methylation is strongly and negatively associate with gene expression variability in honey bees, while it shows no such association in D. melanogaster. These results suggest the evolutionary loss of DNA methylation in some insect lineages has reshaped the molecular mechanisms concerning the regulation of gene expression variability.

Citing Articles

Epigenetics Research in Evolutionary Biology: Perspectives on Timescales and Mechanisms.

Yi S Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39235767 PMC: 11376073. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae170.

References
1.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

2.
Harris K, Lloyd J, Domb K, Zilberman D, Zemach A . DNA methylation is maintained with high fidelity in the honey bee germline and exhibits global non-functional fluctuations during somatic development. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2019; 12(1):62. PMC: 6786280. DOI: 10.1186/s13072-019-0307-4. View

3.
Genc O, An J, Fetter R, Kulik Y, Zunino G, Sanders S . Homeostatic plasticity fails at the intersection of autism-gene mutations and a novel class of common genetic modifiers. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7394548. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.55775. View

4.
Hunt B, Glastad K, Yi S, Goodisman M . Patterning and regulatory associations of DNA methylation are mirrored by histone modifications in insects. Genome Biol Evol. 2013; 5(3):591-8. PMC: 3622302. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt030. View

5.
Cavin Perier R, Junier T, Bucher P . The Eukaryotic Promoter Database EPD. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26(1):353-7. PMC: 147208. DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.1.353. View