» Articles » PMID: 36136807

Comparison of Physical Function Among Elderly Japanese Women with and Without Low Bone Mass and Low Muscle Mass: A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Women Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Sep 22
PMID 36136807
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A decline in physical function is common among elderly people who have lost both bone and muscle mass. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between low bone and muscle mass and physical function in elderly women of different age groups who exercise regularly. The analysis included 299 elderly women. Low bone mass was determined by a T-score of −2.5 or less, and low muscle mass was determined by a skeletal muscle mass index of <5.7 kg/m2. Physical function was measured by grip strength, knee extension strength, standing ability, gait function, and balance function. The participants were divided into four groups based on bone and muscle mass (healthy, low bone mass, low muscle mass, and low bone and muscle mass groups), and their physical functions were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in physical function between the low bone and muscle mass and the healthy groups. There were also no statistically significant differences in physical function among the four groups in the late elderly stage (75 and older). Elderly women who exercise regularly are less likely to experience a decline in physical function, even if they have reduced bone and muscle mass.

Citing Articles

Tai Chi Movement Recognition and Precise Intervention for the Elderly Based on Inertial Measurement Units and Temporal Convolutional Neural Networks.

Li X, Zou L, Li H Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39000985 PMC: 11244047. DOI: 10.3390/s24134208.


Age-specific comparisons in the rate of force development of toe pressure strength and its association with the timed up and go test.

Kamasaki T, Otao H, Tanaka S, Hachiya M, Kubo A, Okawa H Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 15(3):689-698.

PMID: 38441837 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-00959-2.

References
1.
Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Iidaka T, Kodama R, Kawaguchi H . Is osteoporosis a predictor for future sarcopenia or vice versa? Four-year observations between the second and third ROAD study surveys. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 28(1):189-199. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3823-0. View

2.
Goodpaster B, Park S, Harris T, Kritchevsky S, Nevitt M, Schwartz A . The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006; 61(10):1059-64. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059. View

3.
Locquet M, Beaudart C, Bruyere O, Kanis J, Delandsheere L, Reginster J . Bone health assessment in older people with or without muscle health impairment. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29(5):1057-1067. PMC: 5948285. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4384-1. View

4.
Bohannon R . Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther. 1986; 66(2):206-9. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/66.2.206. View

5.
Morley J, Anker S, von Haehling S . Prevalence, incidence, and clinical impact of sarcopenia: facts, numbers, and epidemiology-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014; 5(4):253-9. PMC: 4248415. DOI: 10.1007/s13539-014-0161-y. View