» Articles » PMID: 36135594

Screening for Eating Disorders Across Genders in College Students: Initial Validation of the Brief Assessment of Stress and Eating

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the current study was to validate a brief, 10-item screening tool for the identification of EDs-the brief assessment of stress and eating (BASE).

Method: Participants were college students (N = 596; 68.2% cisgender women) from a large Midwestern university who completed the BASE and SCOFF. The Eating Disorders Diagnostic Survey was used to generate DSM-5 ED diagnoses. We evaluated area under the curve (AUC) for both receiver operating curves (ROC) and precision-recall curves (PRC).

Results: Both the BASE and SCOFF performed significantly better than chance at identifying probable EDs in cisgender women (BASE AUC: ROC = .787, PRC = .633, sensitivity = .733, specificity = .697; SCOFF AUC: ROC = .810, PRC = .684, sensitivity = .793, specificity = .701). However, the BASE (AUC: ROC = .821, PRC = .605, sensitivity = .966, specificity = .495) significantly outperformed the SCOFF (AUC: ROC = .710, PRC = .354, sensitivity = .828, specificity = .514) for identifying probable EDs in cisgender college men.

Discussion: The BASE is appropriate for student healthcare and college research settings. Because the BASE outperforms the SCOFF in college men, results from the current study are expected to contribute to improved identification of EDs on college campuses.

Public Significance: The BASE is a new screening tool to identify eating disorders. The BASE performed as well as, if not better than, the SCOFF (particularly in men). Given the need for brief, psychometrically strong, and unbiased ED screening tools in college students, the current study helps address an unmet student healthcare need that we expect will contribute to improved identification of EDs on college campuses.

Citing Articles

Exploring relationships among appetitive traits, negative affect, and binge eating in adults with overweight or obesity.

Pasquale E, Strong D, Manzano M, Eichen D, Peterson C, Boutelle K Eat Behav. 2024; 53:101871.

PMID: 38518632 PMC: 11144099. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101871.


A 4pL item response theory examination of perceived stigma in the screening of eating disorders with the SCOFF among college students.

Barnard-Brak L, Yang Z Eat Weight Disord. 2023; 28(1):79.

PMID: 37792143 PMC: 10550868. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-023-01604-w.

References
1.
Feltner C, Peat C, Reddy S, Riley S, Berkman N, Middleton J . Screening for Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2022; 327(11):1068-1082. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.1807. View

2.
Morgan J, Reid F, Lacey J . The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ. 1999; 319(7223):1467-8. PMC: 28290. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467. View

3.
Hanley J, McNeil B . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148(3):839-43. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. View

4.
Tang X, Forbush K, Lui P . Development and validation of the Chinese-language version of the eating pathology symptoms inventory. Int J Eat Disord. 2015; 48(7):1016-23. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22423. View

5.
Graham A, Trockel M, Weisman H, Fitzsimmons-Craft E, Balantekin K, Wilfley D . A screening tool for detecting eating disorder risk and diagnostic symptoms among college-age women. J Am Coll Health. 2018; 67(4):357-366. PMC: 6320726. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1483936. View