» Articles » PMID: 36135397

Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Sep 22
PMID 36135397
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microcalcification clusters (MCs) are among the most important biomarkers for breast cancer, especially in cases of nonpalpable lesions. The vast majority of deep learning studies on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) are focused on detecting and classifying lesions, especially soft-tissue lesions, in small regions of interest previously selected. Only about 25% of the studies are specific to MCs, and all of them are based on the classification of small preselected regions. Classifying the whole image according to the presence or absence of MCs is a difficult task due to the size of MCs and all the information present in an entire image. A completely automatic and direct classification, which receives the entire image, without prior identification of any regions, is crucial for the usefulness of these techniques in a real clinical and screening environment. The main purpose of this work is to implement and evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) regarding an automatic classification of a complete DBT image for the presence or absence of MCs (without any prior identification of regions). In this work, four popular deep CNNs are trained and compared with a new architecture proposed by us. The main task of these trainings was the classification of DBT cases by absence or presence of MCs. A public database of realistic simulated data was used, and the whole DBT image was taken into account as input. DBT data were considered without and with preprocessing (to study the impact of noise reduction and contrast enhancement methods on the evaluation of MCs with CNNs). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance. Very promising results were achieved with a maximum AUC of 94.19% for the GoogLeNet. The second-best AUC value was obtained with a new implemented network, CNN-a, with 91.17%. This CNN had the particularity of also being the fastest, thus becoming a very interesting model to be considered in other studies. With this work, encouraging outcomes were achieved in this regard, obtaining similar results to other studies for the detection of larger lesions such as masses. Moreover, given the difficulty of visualizing the MCs, which are often spread over several slices, this work may have an important impact on the clinical analysis of DBT images.

Citing Articles

On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Iqbal S, Qureshi A, Li J, Mahmood T Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2023; 30(5):3173-3233.

PMID: 37260910 PMC: 10071480. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-023-09899-9.


Avoiding Tissue Overlap in 2D Images: Single-Slice DBT Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Mendes J, Matela N, Garcia N Tomography. 2023; 9(1):398-412.

PMID: 36828384 PMC: 9962912. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9010032.


The Role of Deep Learning in Advancing Breast Cancer Detection Using Different Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review.

Madani M, Mahdi Behzadi M, Nabavi S Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(21).

PMID: 36358753 PMC: 9655692. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215334.

References
1.
Bai J, Posner R, Wang T, Yang C, Nabavi S . Applying deep learning in digital breast tomosynthesis for automatic breast cancer detection: A review. Med Image Anal. 2021; 71:102049. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102049. View

2.
Skaane P, Sebuodegard S, Bandos A, Gur D, Osteras B, Gullien R . Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 169(3):489-496. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4705-2. View

3.
Freer P, Riegert J, Eisenmenger L, Ose D, Winkler N, Stein M . Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 166(2):501-509. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4431-1. View

4.
Zeng R, Samuelson F, Sharma D, Badal A, Christian G, Glick S . Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an imaging clinical trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020; 7(4):042802. PMC: 7043285. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042802. View

5.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lang K, Gubern-Merida A, Broeders M, Gennaro G, Clauser P . Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; 111(9):916-922. PMC: 6748773. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy222. View