» Articles » PMID: 36131719

Application of Three-dimensional-printed Porous Tantalum Cones in Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision to Reconstruct Bone Defects

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 22
PMID 36131719
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has emerged as a new treatment method due to its precision and personalization. This study aims to explore the application of a 3D-printed personalized porous tantalum cone for reconstructing the bone defect in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision. : Between November 2017 and October 2020, six patients underwent bone reconstruction using 3D-printed porous tantalum cones in TKA revision. The knee function was assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score pre- and postoperatively. The pain was measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively. The quality of life was measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to pre- and postoperatively evaluate the relief of pain. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were also recorded. At the last follow-up, all patients received X-ray and computed tomography (CT) to confirm the effect of bone reconstruction. After an average follow-up duration of 26.3 months, no patients developed any operation-related complications. The average intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volumes were 250.1 ± 76.4 ml and 506.7 ± 300.8 ml, respectively. At the last follow-up, the HSS score was significantly higher than that before operation, indicating that the knee function was significantly improved ( < 0.001). During the follow-up, the mean VAS score decreased and the mean SF-36 score increased, both of which were significantly improved compared with preoperative conditions ( < 0.001). Radiological examination at the final follow-up showed that cones implanted into the joint were stable and bone defects were effectively reconstructed. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed porous tantalum cones could effectively reconstruct bone defects and offer anatomical support in TKA revision. Further studies are still needed to confirm the long-term effect of 3D-printed tantalum cones for reconstructing bone defects.

Citing Articles

Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional-Printed Orthopedic Implants and Surgical Devices Are Potential Alternatives to Conventional Technology But Require Additional Characterization.

McAnena A, McClennen T, Zheng H Clin Orthop Surg. 2025; 17(1):1-15.

PMID: 39912074 PMC: 11791502. DOI: 10.4055/cios23294.


3D preoperative plan assisted total knee arthroplasty after knee arthrodesis with patella absence: a case report.

Liu L, Lei K, Yang P, Guo L BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):964.

PMID: 39593013 PMC: 11590562. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08086-6.


Progress in the Application of Porous Tantalum Metal in Hip Joint Surgery.

Ma K, Ma Z, Cheng L, Zhao D Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(12):2877-2886.

PMID: 39412173 PMC: 11608769. DOI: 10.1111/os.14255.


Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang L, Zhang Z, Chen Z, Zhang G, Zhang T, Kuang H Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(5):1484-1498.

PMID: 38883347 PMC: 11170588. DOI: 10.62347/VZLG2317.


3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects.

Meng M, Wang J, Huang H, Liu X, Zhang J, Li Z J Orthop Translat. 2023; 42:94-112.

PMID: 37675040 PMC: 10480061. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004.


References
1.
Kirschbaum S, Weynandt C, Fuchs M, Perka C, Gwinner C . Major Shortening of the Patellar Tendon During Septic Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Revision Using Static Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(9):1851-1857. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.082. View

2.
Howard J, Kudera J, Lewallen D, Hanssen A . Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(5):478-84. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01322. View

3.
Hu B, Chen Y, Zhu H, Wu H, Yan S . Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 32(2):666-674. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.011. View

4.
England T, Pagkalos J, Jeys L, Botchu R, Carey Smith R . Additive manufacturing of porous titanium metaphyseal components: Early osseointegration and implant stability in revision knee arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 15:60-64. PMC: 7920135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.042. View

5.
Lotke P, Carolan G, Puri N . Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(4 Suppl 1):57-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.019. View