» Articles » PMID: 36130724

Transposons and CRISPR: Rewiring Gene Editing

Overview
Journal Biochemistry
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2022 Sep 21
PMID 36130724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is driving a gene editing revolution because of its simple reprogramming. However, off-target effects and dependence on the double-strand break repair pathways impose important limitations. Because homology-directed repair acts primarily in actively dividing cells, many of the current gene correction/replacement approaches are restricted to a minority of cell types. Furthermore, current approaches display low efficiency upon insertion of large DNA cargos (e.g., sequences containing multiple gene circuits with tunable functionalities). Recent research has revealed new links between CRISPR-Cas systems and transposons providing new scaffolds that might overcome some of these limitations. Here, we comment on two new transposon-associated RNA-guided mechanisms considering their potential as new gene editing solutions. Initially, we focus on a group of small RNA-guided endonucleases of the IS200/IS605 family of transposons, which likely evolved into class 2 CRISPR effector nucleases (Cas9s and Cas12s). We explore the diversity of these nucleases (named OMEGA, obligate mobile element-guided activity) and analyze their similarities with class 2 gene editors. OMEGA nucleases can perform gene editing in human cells and constitute promising candidates for the design of new compact RNA-guided platforms. Then, we address the co-option of the RNA-guided activity of different CRISPR effector nucleases by a specialized group of Tn7-like transposons to target transposon integration. We describe the various mechanisms used by these RNA-guided transposons for target site selection and integration. Finally, we assess the potential of these new systems to circumvent some of the current gene editing challenges.

Citing Articles

CRISPR beyond: harnessing compact RNA-guided endonucleases for enhanced genome editing.

Wang F, Ma S, Zhang S, Ji Q, Hu C Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 67(12):2563-2574.

PMID: 39012436 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2566-8.


Nonviral Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Using Protein-Agnostic, High-Loading Porous Silicon and Polymer Nanoparticles.

Fletcher R, Stokes L, Kelly 3rd I, Henderson K, Vallecillo-Viejo I, Colazo J ACS Nano. 2023; 17(17):16412-16431.

PMID: 37582231 PMC: 11129837. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c12261.


Editorial: Overcoming genome editing challenges in plants: new tools and nanotechnologies.

Rustgi S, Zhang H, Oz T Front Genome Ed. 2023; 5:1230424.

PMID: 37324649 PMC: 10267455. DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1230424.

References
1.
May E, Craig N . Switching from cut-and-paste to replicative Tn7 transposition. Science. 1996; 272(5260):401-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.272.5260.401. View

2.
Pasternak C, Ton-Hoang B, Coste G, Bailone A, Chandler M, Sommer S . Irradiation-induced Deinococcus radiodurans genome fragmentation triggers transposition of a single resident insertion sequence. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(1):e1000799. PMC: 2806898. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000799. View

3.
Kersulyte D, Velapatino B, Dailide G, Mukhopadhyay A, Ito Y, Cahuayme L . Transposable element ISHp608 of Helicobacter pylori: nonrandom geographic distribution, functional organization, and insertion specificity. J Bacteriol. 2002; 184(4):992-1002. PMC: 134827. DOI: 10.1128/jb.184.4.992-1002.2002. View

4.
Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M . Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(13):6064-8. PMC: 44138. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064. View

5.
Arnoult N, Correia A, Ma J, Merlo A, Garcia-Gomez S, Maric M . Regulation of DNA repair pathway choice in S and G2 phases by the NHEJ inhibitor CYREN. Nature. 2017; 549(7673):548-552. PMC: 5624508. DOI: 10.1038/nature24023. View