» Articles » PMID: 36130711

Conversion of Automated 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretations to OMOP CDM Vocabulary

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2022 Sep 21
PMID 36130711
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A computerized 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can automatically generate diagnostic statements, which are helpful for clinical purposes. Standardization is required for big data analysis when using ECG data generated by different interpretation algorithms. The common data model (CDM) is a standard schema designed to overcome heterogeneity between medical data. Diagnostic statements usually contain multiple CDM concepts and also include non-essential noise information, which should be removed during CDM conversion. Existing CDM conversion tools have several limitations, such as the requirement for manual validation, inability to extract multiple CDM concepts, and inadequate noise removal.

Objectives: We aim to develop a fully automated text data conversion algorithm that overcomes limitations of existing tools and manual conversion.

Methods: We used interpretations printed by 12-lead resting ECG tests from three different vendors: GE Medical Systems, Philips Medical Systems, and Nihon Kohden. For automatic mapping, we first constructed an ontology-lexicon of ECG interpretations. After clinical coding, an optimized tool for converting ECG interpretation to CDM terminology is developed using term-based text processing.

Results: Using the ontology-lexicon, the cosine similarity-based algorithm and rule-based hierarchical algorithm showed comparable conversion accuracy (97.8 and 99.6%, respectively), while an integrated algorithm based on a heuristic approach, ECG2CDM, demonstrated superior performance (99.9%) for datasets from three major vendors.

Conclusion: We developed a user-friendly software that runs the ECG2CDM algorithm that is easy to use even if the user is not familiar with CDM or medical terminology. We propose that automated algorithms can be helpful for further big data analysis with an integrated and standardized ECG dataset.

Citing Articles

Coverage of Physical Therapy Assessments in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

French M, Hartman P, Hayes H, Ling L, Magel J, Thackeray A Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):1003-1012.

PMID: 39174009 PMC: 11602249. DOI: 10.1055/a-2401-3688.

References
1.
Liu H, Chen D, Chen D, Zhang X, Li H, Bian L . A large-scale multi-label 12-lead electrocardiogram database with standardized diagnostic statements. Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):272. PMC: 9174207. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01403-5. View

2.
Catling F, Spithourakis G, Riedel S . Towards automated clinical coding. Int J Med Inform. 2018; 120:50-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.021. View

3.
Makadia R, Ryan P . Transforming the Premier Perspective Hospital Database into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015; 2(1):1110. PMC: 4371500. DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1110. View

4.
Ternois I, Escudie J, Benamouzig R, Duclos C . Development of an Automatic Coding System for Digestive Endoscopies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018; 255:107-111. View

5.
Sathappan S, Jeon Y, Dang T, Lim S, Shao Y, Tai E . Transformation of Electronic Health Records and Questionnaire Data to OMOP CDM: A Feasibility Study Using SG_T2DM Dataset. Appl Clin Inform. 2021; 12(4):757-767. PMC: 8357458. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732301. View