» Articles » PMID: 36129811

Persistent Child Poverty and Mortality in a Cohort of Children with Cancer in Alabama

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One-fifth of U.S. counties are designated persistent child poverty counties (≥20% of children in poverty since 1980). The association between a persistent child poverty environment and mortality in children with cancer is unknown.

Methods: Our cohort includes 2,089 children with cancer (2000-2016) in Alabama. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling (adjusted for sociodemographics/clinical characteristics) to assess mortality by persistent child poverty designation at 1, 5, and 10 years from diagnosis. Distance to treatment was subsequently explored.

Results: Forty-two percent of the cohort lived in a persistent child poverty county; they were more likely to be African American (P < 0.0001), have public/no insurance (P = 0.0009), and live >100 miles to treatment (P < 0.0001). Children in persistent child poverty counties were 30% more likely to die by 5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.59; P = 0.012]. Distance (per 20-mile increase) to treatment was associated with a 9% increased mortality risk (P < 0.0001). Children with both exposures (distance >100 miles and persistent child poverty) faced the highest mortality risk at 5 years (HR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.39-2.33; P < 0.0001). In subanalysis, children exposed to persistent child poverty were at higher risk for cancer-related mortality. However, the risk of health-related mortality did not differ.

Conclusions: Among children with cancer from the Deep South, persistent child poverty was a prevalent exposure associated with inferior overall survival. Distance to treatment was independently associated with inferior survival. Children with both exposures had the highest risk of mortality.

Impact: Persistent child poverty is associated with inferior survival among children with cancer; mechanisms underlying this disparity warrant investigation. See related commentary by Orjuela-Grimm and Beauchemin, p. 295.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of childhood cancer survivors attending a specialized survivorship clinic in the Deep South.

Hoppmann A, Dai C, Hageman L, Francisco L, Knight J, Mast A J Cancer Surviv. 2024; .

PMID: 39107579 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01636-w.


Description of census-tract-level social determinants of health in cancer surveillance data.

Bhattacharya M, Cronin K, Farrigan T, Kennedy A, Yu M, Srinivasan S J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024; 2024(65):152-161.

PMID: 39102885 PMC: 11300002. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae027.

References
1.
Gelijns A, Gabriel S . Looking beyond translation--integrating clinical research with medical practice. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(18):1659-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1201850. View

2.
Moss J, Liu B, Feuer E . Urban/Rural Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Incidence: The Mediating Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Provider Density. Womens Health Issues. 2017; 27(6):683-691. PMC: 5694385. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.008. View

3.
Moss J, Pinto C, Srinivasan S, Cronin K, Croyle R . Persistent Poverty and Cancer Mortality Rates: An Analysis of County-Level Poverty Designations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020; 29(10):1949-1954. PMC: 7534551. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0007. View

4.
Chen E, Paterson L . Neighborhood, family, and subjective socioeconomic status: How do they relate to adolescent health?. Health Psychol. 2006; 25(6):704-14. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.704. View

5.
Rotz S, Wei W, Thomas S, Hanna R . Distance to treatment center is associated with survival in children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2020; 126(24):5319-5327. PMC: 7686274. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33175. View