» Articles » PMID: 36128358

Acute Pelvic Pain: A Pictorial Review with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Sep 21
PMID 36128358
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute uterine emergencies constitute both obstetric and gynecologic conditions. The superior image resolution, superior soft-tissue characterization, and lack of ionizing radiation make magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preferable over ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) in investigating uterine emergencies. Although USG is the first-line imaging modality and is easily accessible, it has limitations. USG is an operator dependent and limited by patient factors such as obesity and muscle atrophy. CT is limited by its risk of teratogenicity in pregnant females, poor tissue differentiation, and radiation effect. The non-specific findings on CT may lead to misinterpretation of the pathology. MRI overcomes all these limitations and is emerging as the most crucial imaging modality in the emergency room (ER). The evolving 3D MR sequences further reduce the acquisition times, expanding its ER role. Although MRI is not the first-line imaging modality, it is a problem-solving tool when the ultrasound and CT are inconclusive. This pictorial review discusses the various MRI techniques used in uterine imaging and the appearances of distinct etiologies of uterine emergencies across different MRI sequences.

Citing Articles

Gynaecological Causes of Acute Pelvic Pain: Common and Not-So-Common Imaging Findings.

Franco P, Garcia-Baizan A, Aymerich M, Maino C, Frade-Santos S, Ippolito D Life (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37895407 PMC: 10608316. DOI: 10.3390/life13102025.

References
1.
Outwater E, Mitchell D . Normal ovaries and functional cysts: MR appearance. Radiology. 1996; 198(2):397-402. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596839. View

2.
Salim S, Won H, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Campbell N, Abbott J . Diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps: a critical review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18(5):569-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.018. View

3.
Grover S, Antil N, Katyan A, Rajani H, Grover H, Mittal P . Niche role of MRI in the evaluation of female infertility. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020; 30(1):32-45. PMC: 7240899. DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_377_19. View

4.
Bourgioti C, Preza O, Panourgias E, Chatoupis K, Antoniou A, Nikolaidou M . MR imaging of endometriosis: Spectrum of disease. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017; 98(11):751-767. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.05.009. View

5.
Parker 3rd R, Yano M, Tai A, Friedman M, Narra V, Menias C . MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2012; 32(5):1445-60. DOI: 10.1148/rg.325115153. View