» Articles » PMID: 36125057

Direct-acting Antiviral Retreatment Patterns for Hepatitis C

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2022 Sep 20
PMID 36125057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the strong efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against the hepatitis C virus, many patients require a second regimen of DAA treatment. However, limited research exists to characterize rates of retreatment across different DAA agents or potential factors that may increase retreatment risk. To characterize patterns and predictors of DAA retreatment among a large, generalizable, commercially insured US population of patients. Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data source, this retrospective cohort study examined retreatment patterns among patients receiving DAAs between 2013 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics predictive of retreatment risk and to examine rates of retreatment in patients initiating different DAA treatments. Among 31,553 DAA users, a total of 1,017 (3.2%) required DAA retreatment. Among the 1,017 patients re-treated, 44 (4.3%) received a third treatment regimen and 2 patients received a fourth treatment regimen. The average total cost for a retreatment regimen was $109,683, with patient out-of-pocket costs totaling $1,287 Patients requiring retreatment had higher rates of hypertension (32.0% vs 26.7%; < 0.001), diabetes (16.9% vs 11.9%; < 0.001), coagulopathy (9.9% vs 4.5%; < 0.001), deficiency anemia (11.1% vs 7.4%; < 0.001), alcohol abuse (3.3% vs 2.3%; = 0.038), prior liver transplantation (3.4% vs 2.3%; = 0.024), and hepatocellular carcinoma (6.1% vs 1.9%; < 0.001) compared with patients not requiring retreatment. Although uncommon, some patients receiving DAAs require a second regimen of DAA treatment at substantial cost to both health plans and patients. These patients tend to have more comorbidities and markers of hepatic disease severity. Patients with high retreatment risk may benefit from careful monitoring for occurrences of retreatment.

References
1.
Poordad F, Felizarta F, Asatryan A, Sulkowski M, Reindollar R, Landis C . Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for 12 weeks for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and prior direct-acting antiviral treatment. Hepatology. 2017; 66(2):389-397. PMC: 5573922. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29081. View

2.
Pearlman B, Perrys M, Hinds A . Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir for Previous Treatment Failures With Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114(9):1550-1552. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000248. View

3.
Shakeri A, Srimurugathasan N, Suda K, Gomes T, Tadrous M . Spending on Hepatitis C Antivirals in the United States and Canada, 2014 to 2018. Value Health. 2020; 23(9):1137-1141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.021. View

4.
Craine N, Hickman M, Parry J, Smith J, Walker A, Russell D . Incidence of hepatitis C in drug injectors: the role of homelessness, opiate substitution treatment, equipment sharing, and community size. Epidemiol Infect. 2009; 137(9):1255-65. DOI: 10.1017/S095026880900212X. View

5.
Melia M, Muir A, McCone J, Shiffman M, King J, Herrine S . Racial differences in hepatitis C treatment eligibility. Hepatology. 2011; 54(1):70-8. PMC: 3736356. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24358. View