» Articles » PMID: 36123087

Child and Family-focused Interventions for Child Maltreatment and Domestic Abuse: Development of Core Outcome Sets

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Sep 19
PMID 36123087
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current evidence for child maltreatment (CM) and domestic violence and abuse (DVA) interventions is limited by the diversity of outcomes evaluated and the variety of measures used. The result is studies that are difficult to compare and lack focus on outcomes reflecting service user or provider priorities.

Objective: To develop core outcome sets (COSs) for evaluations of child and family-focused interventions for: (1) CM and (2) DVA.

Design: We conducted a two-stage consensus process. Stage 1: a long list of candidate outcomes across CM and DVA was developed through rapid systematic reviews of intervention studies, qualitative and grey literature; stakeholder workshops; survivor interviews. Stage 2: three-panel, three-round e-Delphi surveys for CM and DVA with consensus meetings to agree with the final COSs.

Participants: 287 stakeholders participated in at least one stage of the process (ie, either CM or DVA COS development): workshops (n=76), two e-Delphi surveys (n=170) and consensus meetings (n=43). Stakeholders included CM and DVA survivors, practitioners, commissioners, policymakers and researchers.

Results: Stage 1 identified 335 outcomes categorised into 9 areas and 39 domains. Following stage 2, the final five outcomes included in the CM-COS were: child emotional health and well-being; child's trusted relationships; feelings of safety; child abuse and neglect; service harms. The final five outcomes in the DVA-COS were: child emotional health and well-being; caregiver emotional health and well-being; family relationships; freedom to go about daily life; feelings of safety.

Conclusions: We developed two COSs for CM and DVA with two common outcomes (child emotional health and well-being; feelings of safety). The COSs reflect shared priorities among service users, providers and researchers. Use of these COSs across trials and service evaluations for children and families affected by CM and DVA will make outcome selection more consistent and help harmonise research and practice.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of UK-based support interventions and services aimed at adults who have experienced or used domestic and sexual violence and abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlisle S, Bunce A, Prina M, McManus S, Barbosa E, Feder G BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):1003.

PMID: 40087589 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21891-5.


Adapting a consensus process for survivors of domestic abuse and child maltreatment: a brief report about adopting a trauma-informed approach in multistakeholder workshops.

Powell C, Szilassy E, Cowan K, Feder G, Gilbert R, Howarth E BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e090017.

PMID: 39843367 PMC: 11784130. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090017.


Trends in outcomes used to measure the effectiveness of UK-based support interventions and services targeted at adults with experience of domestic and sexual violence and abuse: a scoping review.

Carlisle S, Bunce A, Prina M, Cook E, Barbosa E, McManus S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e074452.

PMID: 38688671 PMC: 11086554. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074452.


Harmonising outcome measurement for child focused domestic abuse interventions. Reflections on the development and implementation of a core outcome set.

Howarth E, Feder G, Barter C, Powell C Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1296437.

PMID: 38528980 PMC: 10961467. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1296437.


The Modern Slavery Core Outcome Set: A Survivor-Driven Consensus on Priority Outcomes for Recovery, Wellbeing, and Reintegration.

Jannesari S, Damara B, Witkin R, Katona C, Sit Q, Dang M Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(3):2377-2389.

PMID: 37991003 PMC: 11155204. DOI: 10.1177/15248380231211955.

References
1.
Kirkham J, Davis K, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Tunis S . Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(11):e1002447. PMC: 5689835. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. View

2.
Howarth E, Powell C, Woodman J, Walker E, Chesters H, Szilassy E . Protocol for developing core outcome sets for evaluation of psychosocial interventions for children and families with experience or at risk of child maltreatment or domestic abuse. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e044431. PMC: 8383853. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044431. View

3.
Belsky J . Etiology of child maltreatment: a developmental-ecological analysis. Psychol Bull. 1993; 114(3):413-34. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.413. View

4.
Rivas C, Ramsay J, Sadowski L, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S . Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (12):CD005043. PMC: 9392211. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub3. View

5.
Campbell A, Thompson S . The emotional maltreatment of children in domestically violent homes: Identifying gaps in education and addressing common misconceptions. The risk of harm to children in domestically violent homes mandates a well-coordinated response. Child Abuse Negl. 2015; 48:39-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.08.009. View